Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in Primary Care- Assessing Readiness for Change

Haiyun Wang, C. Snyder, Sharon Larson, V. Vogel, H. Kirchner, Haiyan Sun, Xiaowei Yan
{"title":"Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in Primary Care- Assessing Readiness for Change","authors":"Haiyun Wang, C. Snyder, Sharon Larson, V. Vogel, H. Kirchner, Haiyan Sun, Xiaowei Yan","doi":"10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_SUPPL.1547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Despite breast cancer chemoprevention recommendations, chemoprevention use remains low. We assess primary care providers’ (PCP) awareness and use of breast cancer chemoprevention, and perceived barriers/ solutions. \nMethods: We conducted an online survey to investigate PCPs’ awareness and use of breast cancer chemoprevention, and perceived barriers/solutions. 161/426 (38%) eligible PCPs completed the survey. \nResults: Of providers, 42% reported using breast cancer risk assessment models, only 9% prescribed breast cancer chemoprevention drugs in the past year. Providers using risk models were more likely to have made a breast cancer diagnosis in the past year (77% vs. 56%; p=0.01). Providers prescribed chemoprevention were older (mean 49 years vs. 40; p=0.01), more likely to be in practice ≥ 10 years (71% vs. 43%; p=0.04) and full time (79% vs. 49%; P=0.04); they all had diagnosed breast cancer in the past year (100% vs. 61%; p=0.002). Top three reported barriers to chemoprevention guideline adherence were lack of knowledge about chemoprevention drugs, unaware of chemoprevention guidelines, and inability to identify high-risk women. After adjustment for other provider characteristics and barriers, the PCPs who are unaware of chemoprevention guidelines have 3.1 increased odds (CI: 1.4-6.7) for not using risk assessment models. If high-risk women can be identified, 85% of respondents prefer referring appropriate women to a high-risk breast clinic. \nConclusion: PCPs infrequently assess breast cancer risk and rarely prescribe chemoprevention drugs for risk reduction. PCP education on breast cancer prevention and establishing high-risk breast clinics may improve breast cancer chemoprevention uptake.","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_SUPPL.1547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Despite breast cancer chemoprevention recommendations, chemoprevention use remains low. We assess primary care providers’ (PCP) awareness and use of breast cancer chemoprevention, and perceived barriers/ solutions. Methods: We conducted an online survey to investigate PCPs’ awareness and use of breast cancer chemoprevention, and perceived barriers/solutions. 161/426 (38%) eligible PCPs completed the survey. Results: Of providers, 42% reported using breast cancer risk assessment models, only 9% prescribed breast cancer chemoprevention drugs in the past year. Providers using risk models were more likely to have made a breast cancer diagnosis in the past year (77% vs. 56%; p=0.01). Providers prescribed chemoprevention were older (mean 49 years vs. 40; p=0.01), more likely to be in practice ≥ 10 years (71% vs. 43%; p=0.04) and full time (79% vs. 49%; P=0.04); they all had diagnosed breast cancer in the past year (100% vs. 61%; p=0.002). Top three reported barriers to chemoprevention guideline adherence were lack of knowledge about chemoprevention drugs, unaware of chemoprevention guidelines, and inability to identify high-risk women. After adjustment for other provider characteristics and barriers, the PCPs who are unaware of chemoprevention guidelines have 3.1 increased odds (CI: 1.4-6.7) for not using risk assessment models. If high-risk women can be identified, 85% of respondents prefer referring appropriate women to a high-risk breast clinic. Conclusion: PCPs infrequently assess breast cancer risk and rarely prescribe chemoprevention drugs for risk reduction. PCP education on breast cancer prevention and establishing high-risk breast clinics may improve breast cancer chemoprevention uptake.
初级保健中的乳腺癌化学预防——评估改变的准备程度
目的:尽管有乳腺癌化学预防的建议,化学预防的使用仍然很低。我们评估初级保健提供者(PCP)对乳腺癌化学预防的认识和使用,以及感知到的障碍/解决方案。方法:通过在线调查,了解pcp对乳腺癌化学预防的认知和使用情况,以及感知到的障碍/解决方案。161/426(38%)合资格的pcp完成调查。结果:42%的提供者报告使用乳腺癌风险评估模型,只有9%的提供者在过去一年中开了乳腺癌化学预防药物。使用风险模型的提供者在过去一年中更有可能做出乳腺癌诊断(77%对56%;p = 0.01)。开化学预防处方的提供者年龄较大(平均49岁vs. 40岁;P =0.01),更有可能在实践≥10年(71% vs. 43%;P =0.04)和全职(79% vs. 49%;P = 0.04);他们都在过去一年中被诊断出患有乳腺癌(100%比61%;p = 0.002)。据报道,遵守化学预防指南的前三大障碍是缺乏对化学预防药物的了解,不了解化学预防指南,以及无法识别高危妇女。在对其他提供者特征和障碍进行调整后,不了解化学预防指南的pcp不使用风险评估模型的几率增加了3.1 (CI: 1.4-6.7)。如果可以确定高危妇女,85%的答复者倾向于将适当的妇女转到高危乳房诊所。结论:pcp很少评估乳腺癌风险,很少开具化学预防药物以降低风险。预防乳腺癌的PCP教育和建立高危乳腺诊所可以提高乳腺癌化学预防的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信