Efficacy of Modified Technique in Pancreatojejunostomy to Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy

N. Chiba, M. Shimazu, Masaaki Okihara, T. Sano, K. Tomita, K. Takano, S. Kawachi
{"title":"Efficacy of Modified Technique in Pancreatojejunostomy to Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy","authors":"N. Chiba, M. Shimazu, Masaaki Okihara, T. Sano, K. Tomita, K. Takano, S. Kawachi","doi":"10.4172/2165-7092.1000174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the single most important cause of morbidity. We present a modification for duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. Materials and Methods: Total 134 patients, who had undergone PD or pylorus preserving PD (PPPD) between November 2007 and October 2013 at our institution, were analyzed. From April 2012 to December 2014, 53 consecutive patients underwent PD or PPPD by the new modified technique and 81 patients by the former technique before March 2012. The preoperative demographics and clinical information were retrospectively obtained from both groups and were analyzed along with risk factors of POPF. Moreover, risk factors for POPF grade B/C were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Operation procedures were pylorus preserving PD in 119 and PD in 15. Incidence of POPF grade B/C was 11% in the new method, which was significantly lower than in the former method (38%) (p=0.0135). Moreover, risk factors for POPF grade B/C in univariate analysis were texture of pancreas (p=0.0004), dilatation of pancreatic duct (p=0.0100), and anastomosis method (p=0.0135). In multivariate analysis, risk factors were texture of pancreas (p=0.0010) and anastomosis method (p=0.053). Conclusions: The new technique in pancreticojejunostomy was safe and reliable with low POPF grade B/C rate.","PeriodicalId":89708,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatic disorders & therapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatic disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7092.1000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: In pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the single most important cause of morbidity. We present a modification for duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. Materials and Methods: Total 134 patients, who had undergone PD or pylorus preserving PD (PPPD) between November 2007 and October 2013 at our institution, were analyzed. From April 2012 to December 2014, 53 consecutive patients underwent PD or PPPD by the new modified technique and 81 patients by the former technique before March 2012. The preoperative demographics and clinical information were retrospectively obtained from both groups and were analyzed along with risk factors of POPF. Moreover, risk factors for POPF grade B/C were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Operation procedures were pylorus preserving PD in 119 and PD in 15. Incidence of POPF grade B/C was 11% in the new method, which was significantly lower than in the former method (38%) (p=0.0135). Moreover, risk factors for POPF grade B/C in univariate analysis were texture of pancreas (p=0.0004), dilatation of pancreatic duct (p=0.0100), and anastomosis method (p=0.0135). In multivariate analysis, risk factors were texture of pancreas (p=0.0010) and anastomosis method (p=0.053). Conclusions: The new technique in pancreticojejunostomy was safe and reliable with low POPF grade B/C rate.
改良胰空肠吻合术预防胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的疗效观察
在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中,术后胰瘘(POPF)仍然是唯一最重要的发病原因。我们提出一种改良的胰空肠管-粘膜吻合术。材料与方法:对2007年11月至2013年10月在我院行PD或保幽门PD (PPPD)手术的134例患者进行分析。2012年4月至2014年12月,采用新改良技术连续行PD或PPPD患者53例,2012年3月前采用原技术行PD或PPPD患者81例。回顾性分析两组患者的术前人口学和临床资料,并分析发生POPF的危险因素。此外,采用单因素和多因素分析方法分析POPF B/C级的危险因素。结果:手术方式为保幽门PD 119例,保幽门PD 15例。新方法的POPF B/C级发生率为11%,显著低于原方法的38% (p=0.0135)。单因素分析中,胰腺质地(p=0.0004)、胰管扩张(p=0.0100)、吻合方式(p=0.0135)是POPF分级B/C的危险因素。多因素分析的危险因素为胰腺质地(p=0.0010)和吻合方式(p=0.053)。结论:新技术应用于胰空肠吻合术安全可靠,POPF分级B/C率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信