Building a Country Rating of Digitalization of the Economy Based on the Principal Component Analysis

A. Ovcharov, A. Terekhov
{"title":"Building a Country Rating of Digitalization of the Economy Based on the Principal Component Analysis","authors":"A. Ovcharov, A. Terekhov","doi":"10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-1-58-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of international comparisons of the level of digitalization of countries based on rating assessments is argued, due to the lack of uniformity in the methods and results of using information and communication technologies. The information base of the study is data from Rosstat and Eurostat on a number of digitalization variables for the period 2016–2020. The methodological basis of the analysis is the principal component method and k-means cluster analysis. The importance of using various statistical tools to assess the scale of digital inequality in the context of countries and regions is argued.Scientific and methodological approaches to studying the problem of digital inequality were generalized. Three levels of digital gaps and statistical indicators reflecting them were allocated. The role of indices as generalizing indicators in assessing the level of digitalization of the economy and society was determined. A rating of European countries was built (in descending order of the calculated digitalization index). A grouping of countries that differ in the level of digital development is proposed, estimates of digital gaps are given.The results of the statistical analysis showed that the leaders of the rating are Finland, Denmark, and Norway; outsiders are Greece, Bulgaria, Romania. All these countries occupy a stable position in the ranking. Three clusters of countries were formed in terms of the level (high, medium, low) of digitalization of the economy. It is shown that the digital gaps between European countries fluctuate in the range of 42–44%. Russia's place in the ranking of 20 countries in the period from 2016 to 2020 was determined.","PeriodicalId":85843,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy statistiki (Moscow, Russia : 1994)","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy statistiki (Moscow, Russia : 1994)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-1-58-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of international comparisons of the level of digitalization of countries based on rating assessments is argued, due to the lack of uniformity in the methods and results of using information and communication technologies. The information base of the study is data from Rosstat and Eurostat on a number of digitalization variables for the period 2016–2020. The methodological basis of the analysis is the principal component method and k-means cluster analysis. The importance of using various statistical tools to assess the scale of digital inequality in the context of countries and regions is argued.Scientific and methodological approaches to studying the problem of digital inequality were generalized. Three levels of digital gaps and statistical indicators reflecting them were allocated. The role of indices as generalizing indicators in assessing the level of digitalization of the economy and society was determined. A rating of European countries was built (in descending order of the calculated digitalization index). A grouping of countries that differ in the level of digital development is proposed, estimates of digital gaps are given.The results of the statistical analysis showed that the leaders of the rating are Finland, Denmark, and Norway; outsiders are Greece, Bulgaria, Romania. All these countries occupy a stable position in the ranking. Three clusters of countries were formed in terms of the level (high, medium, low) of digitalization of the economy. It is shown that the digital gaps between European countries fluctuate in the range of 42–44%. Russia's place in the ranking of 20 countries in the period from 2016 to 2020 was determined.
基于主成分分析的国家经济数字化评价体系构建
有人认为,由于使用信息和通信技术的方法和结果缺乏统一,基于评级评估对各国数字化水平进行国际比较的相关性。该研究的信息库是俄罗斯国家统计局和欧盟统计局关于2016-2020年期间一些数字化变量的数据。分析的方法学基础是主成分法和k-均值聚类分析。本文论述了在国家和地区背景下使用各种统计工具评估数字不平等规模的重要性。概括了研究数字不平等问题的科学和方法论方法。分配了三级数字差距和反映这些差距的统计指标。确定了指标作为评价经济社会数字化水平的泛化指标的作用。建立了欧洲国家的评级(按计算出的数字化指数降序排列)。提出了一组数字发展水平不同的国家,并给出了数字差距的估计。统计分析结果显示,排名靠前的是芬兰、丹麦和挪威;希腊、保加利亚、罗马尼亚是外来者。所有这些国家在排名中占据稳定的位置。根据经济数字化水平(高、中、低)形成了三个国家集群。研究表明,欧洲国家之间的数字差距在42-44%之间波动。2016年至2020年期间,俄罗斯在20个国家中的排名已经确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书