Of Majesty, Mockery, and Misprints: The Coda of Shostakovich’s Fifth on Record

IF 0.4 2区艺术学 0 MUSIC

JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGICAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/01411896.2022.2074845

P. Kupfer

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on work by José Bowen, Nicholas Cook, and Daniel Leech-Wilkinson, in this article I examine the performance history of the coda of Dmitry Shostakovich’s Fifth Symphony (1937) through statistical analysis of tempo in 152 recordings made between 1938 and 2019. I contextualize the trends that emerge from this data within the unique mix of errors, myths, and ideologies that have informed the performance and reception history of the symphony. Ultimately, I demonstrate how changing historical circumstances can affect the meanings of performances (as preserved in recordings) and how empirical methods can help reveal patterns among them.

查看原文本刊更多论文

庄严、嘲弄和印刷错误:肖斯塔科维奇第五交响曲的尾声

本文以joss Bowen、Nicholas Cook和Daniel Leech-Wilkinson的作品为基础，通过对1938年至2019年间制作的152张唱片的节奏进行统计分析，研究了德米特里·肖斯塔科维奇(Dmitry Shostakovich)《第五交响曲》(1937)结尾部分的演奏历史。我将这些数据中出现的趋势置于独特的错误、神话和意识形态的混合中，这些错误、神话和意识形态影响了交响乐的表演和接受历史。最后，我展示了不断变化的历史环境如何影响表演的意义(如保存在录音中的)，以及经验方法如何有助于揭示其中的模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGICAL RESEARCH MUSIC-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Musicological Research publishes original articles on all aspects of the discipline of music: historical musicology, style and repertory studies, music theory, ethnomusicology, music education, organology, and interdisciplinary studies. Because contemporary music scholarship addresses critical and analytical issues from a multiplicity of viewpoints, the Journal of Musicological Research seeks to present studies from all perspectives, using the full spectrum of methodologies. This variety makes the Journal a place where scholarly approaches can coexist, in all their harmony and occasional discord, and one that is not allied with any particular school or viewpoint.