The Age Limit

U. Lehr
{"title":"The Age Limit","authors":"U. Lehr","doi":"10.1109/paiee.1907.6742192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Age Limit. Tiie question of an age limit was settled by the Court of Contributors of the Eoyal Infirmary, at the meeting of the Court on 2nd January, on the principle that 111 future the holders of appointments shall retire at the age of sixty-five, but that the senior members of the present staff shall be ^t liberty to retain office without an age limitation. Although no definite opinion was expressed, the Court appeared to be influenced by the feeling that, were the present holders of office included in rule, injustice would be done to men who had been appointed Ujider use and wont which had existed for upwards of a century. The plain fact is, that only a very small proportion of the members of the Court appreciated what important issues were involved 111 the proposition. It is subject for regret that the question was Raised on a false issue. The original argument presented to the","PeriodicalId":11487,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/paiee.1907.6742192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Age Limit. Tiie question of an age limit was settled by the Court of Contributors of the Eoyal Infirmary, at the meeting of the Court on 2nd January, on the principle that 111 future the holders of appointments shall retire at the age of sixty-five, but that the senior members of the present staff shall be ^t liberty to retain office without an age limitation. Although no definite opinion was expressed, the Court appeared to be influenced by the feeling that, were the present holders of office included in rule, injustice would be done to men who had been appointed Ujider use and wont which had existed for upwards of a century. The plain fact is, that only a very small proportion of the members of the Court appreciated what important issues were involved 111 the proposition. It is subject for regret that the question was Raised on a false issue. The original argument presented to the
年龄限制
年龄限制。年龄限制的问题在1月2日的法院会议上由皇家医务室的贡献者法院解决,其原则是,未来的任命持有人应在65岁时退休,但现有工作人员的高级成员应不受年龄限制地自由留任。虽然没有明确的意见,但法院似乎受到这样一种感觉的影响,即如果将现任公职人员包括在统治范围内,那么对那些已经存在了一个多世纪的使用和习惯的人来说,将是不公正的。显而易见的事实是,法院法官中只有很小一部分人了解这项提案所涉及的重要问题。令人遗憾的是,这个问题是在一个错误的问题上提出的。原来的论点提出给
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信