Doing Ethnography Remotely: Rethinking Methodologies of Fieldwork in Gabura of Southwest Bangladesh during the Global COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Fahmid Al Zaid
{"title":"Doing Ethnography Remotely: Rethinking Methodologies of Fieldwork in Gabura of Southwest Bangladesh during the Global COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Fahmid Al Zaid","doi":"10.3329/ssr.v39i1.64918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the possible processes of conducting ethnographic fieldwork remotely through mediated ways among the Gabura Islanders in Southwest region of Bangladesh during the global COVID-19 pandemic. As observed, due to the impact of COVID-19, a crisis of choosing the ‘field’ and conducting ‘fieldwork’ has taken place in writing ethnography that requires both methodological and theoretical rethinking. However, the basic of anthropological fieldwork is physical immersion into the culture as much as possible. Also, it has become nearly impossible to conduct field research in such an intimate way during the period of COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic situation has forced the ethnographers to stay home and have had to find new way of gaining access to the field. To this backdrop, this article depicts the possible processes of conducting ethnographic fieldwork through mediated ways such as using digital communications and engaging research assistant in the data collection process. Thus, the article presents author’s own experiences and challenges of doing ethnography remotely through mediates ways by gaining rapport and making interaction with the Gabura Islanders in Southwest Bangladesh during the covid-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, this article does not advocate that in-person immersion of fieldwork should be replaced by alternative means or mediated ways, rather urges to consider the changing methodologies as choices not as necessity of conducting conventional ethnography.\nSocial Science Review, Vol. 39(1), June 2022 Page 165-177","PeriodicalId":40271,"journal":{"name":"Catholic Social Science Review","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholic Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/ssr.v39i1.64918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the possible processes of conducting ethnographic fieldwork remotely through mediated ways among the Gabura Islanders in Southwest region of Bangladesh during the global COVID-19 pandemic. As observed, due to the impact of COVID-19, a crisis of choosing the ‘field’ and conducting ‘fieldwork’ has taken place in writing ethnography that requires both methodological and theoretical rethinking. However, the basic of anthropological fieldwork is physical immersion into the culture as much as possible. Also, it has become nearly impossible to conduct field research in such an intimate way during the period of COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic situation has forced the ethnographers to stay home and have had to find new way of gaining access to the field. To this backdrop, this article depicts the possible processes of conducting ethnographic fieldwork through mediated ways such as using digital communications and engaging research assistant in the data collection process. Thus, the article presents author’s own experiences and challenges of doing ethnography remotely through mediates ways by gaining rapport and making interaction with the Gabura Islanders in Southwest Bangladesh during the covid-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, this article does not advocate that in-person immersion of fieldwork should be replaced by alternative means or mediated ways, rather urges to consider the changing methodologies as choices not as necessity of conducting conventional ethnography. Social Science Review, Vol. 39(1), June 2022 Page 165-177
远程做民族志:在全球COVID-19大流行期间对孟加拉国西南部加布拉实地调查方法的反思
本文描述了在全球COVID-19大流行期间,通过中介方式在孟加拉国西南地区Gabura岛民中远程开展民族志实地调查的可能过程。如上所述,由于2019冠状病毒病的影响,在民族志写作中出现了选择“领域”和进行“实地考察”的危机,需要对方法和理论进行重新思考。然而,人类学田野调查的基础是尽可能地融入文化。而且,在新冠疫情期间,几乎不可能进行如此亲密的实地调查。2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使民族志学家留在家中,不得不寻找进入该领域的新途径。在此背景下,本文描述了通过中介方式(如使用数字通信和在数据收集过程中聘请研究助理)进行民族志田野调查的可能过程。因此,本文介绍了作者自己在covid-19大流行期间通过与孟加拉国西南部Gabura岛民建立关系和互动,通过中介方式远程进行民族志研究的经验和挑战。然而,这篇文章并不主张实地考察的亲身体验应该被替代手段或中介方式所取代,而是敦促人们将不断变化的方法视为一种选择,而不是进行传统民族志的必要条件。《社会科学评论》Vol. 39(1), 2022年6月,第165-177页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书