Perceived value versus real value: Why can investors in sustainable companies fail in their mission?

Biagio F. Giannetti , Juliano Scarpelin , Carlos A. Di Agustini , Maria A.H.L. Paranhos , Paulo A. Lozano , Feni Agostinho , Cecília M.V.B. Almeida
{"title":"Perceived value versus real value: Why can investors in sustainable companies fail in their mission?","authors":"Biagio F. Giannetti ,&nbsp;Juliano Scarpelin ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Di Agustini ,&nbsp;Maria A.H.L. Paranhos ,&nbsp;Paulo A. Lozano ,&nbsp;Feni Agostinho ,&nbsp;Cecília M.V.B. Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Business models and investors should understand the meaning of ‘value’ from a different perspective if the ultimate goal is to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs). New business strategies for pursuing the SDGs and the aptitude to set up cleaner and more collaborative production systems must replace the traditional approaches tied to a value perception that is not coherent with the actual sustainability performance of companies. This outdated but still largely used value perception is often vague, abstract, and lacks more objective models and indicators to avoid misleading choices of investments in companies with low levels of sustainability. Using a mining company in Brazil as an example, this commentary letter aims to provide insights about the need for information rooted in science, considering biophysical perspectives under a systemic approach to fully understand the meaning of value behind companies' performance and support investments in those more sustainable ones. Parameters to quantitatively assess companies' sustainability are presented to start the discussions about how investors can make better choices when putting their money on those really more sustainable companies that, besides returning profits, will support the achievement of SDGs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000185/pdfft?md5=f544eebb93aaf759b5a891fdb1c5e5a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791622000185-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Business models and investors should understand the meaning of ‘value’ from a different perspective if the ultimate goal is to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs). New business strategies for pursuing the SDGs and the aptitude to set up cleaner and more collaborative production systems must replace the traditional approaches tied to a value perception that is not coherent with the actual sustainability performance of companies. This outdated but still largely used value perception is often vague, abstract, and lacks more objective models and indicators to avoid misleading choices of investments in companies with low levels of sustainability. Using a mining company in Brazil as an example, this commentary letter aims to provide insights about the need for information rooted in science, considering biophysical perspectives under a systemic approach to fully understand the meaning of value behind companies' performance and support investments in those more sustainable ones. Parameters to quantitatively assess companies' sustainability are presented to start the discussions about how investors can make better choices when putting their money on those really more sustainable companies that, besides returning profits, will support the achievement of SDGs.

感知价值与实际价值:为什么可持续发展公司的投资者会失败?
如果最终目标是实现可持续发展目标(SDGs),商业模式和投资者应该从不同的角度理解“价值”的含义。追求可持续发展目标的新商业战略,以及建立更清洁、更协作的生产系统的能力,必须取代与企业实际可持续发展绩效不一致的价值观相关的传统方法。这种过时但仍在广泛使用的价值感知往往是模糊、抽象的,缺乏更客观的模型和指标,以避免对可持续性水平较低的公司进行误导性的投资选择。以巴西的一家矿业公司为例,这封评论信旨在提供对基于科学的信息需求的见解,在系统的方法下考虑生物物理学的观点,以充分理解公司业绩背后的价值含义,并支持对那些更具可持续性的公司进行投资。本文提出了定量评估公司可持续性的参数,以开始讨论投资者在投资那些真正更具可持续性的公司时如何做出更好的选择,这些公司除了回报利润外,还将支持实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信