Threshold setting for the evaluation of the aggregate interference in ISM band in hospital environments

L. Mucchi, A. Carpini, Theo D'Anna, M. Virk, R. Vuohtoniemi, M. Hämäläinen, J. Iinatti
{"title":"Threshold setting for the evaluation of the aggregate interference in ISM band in hospital environments","authors":"L. Mucchi, A. Carpini, Theo D'Anna, M. Virk, R. Vuohtoniemi, M. Hämäläinen, J. Iinatti","doi":"10.1109/ISMICT.2015.7107489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of the aggregate interference is required in order to predict the performance of a wireless system in its working environment. Body Area Networks (BANs) for healthcare applications are becoming a reality, allowing patients to be monitored continuously without forcing them to stay in bed or in hospital. The increasing number of wireless medical devices makes the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band particularly crowded. If new smart BANs have to correctly operate in hospital, coexistence with the existing wireless devices must be accurately investigated, starting with studying the interference in the operating frequency band. The intensity of the interference is strongly related to the chosen threshold, which defines if a received sample has to be categorized as interference or noise. Adaptive threshold methods outperform the non-adaptive ones, due to flexibility and robustness. Among the adaptive threshold methods, the forward consecutive mean excision (FCME) is one of the most attractive, since it is blind, computationally simple and efficient. When applied to large data set, it may require too long time to be computed, thus median filtering has been proposed (med-FCME). In this paper we compare the performance of fixed vs adaptive threshold methods. The two methods are applied to a set of real measurements taken in a modern city hospital over one week.","PeriodicalId":6624,"journal":{"name":"2015 9th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT)","volume":"11 1","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 9th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMICT.2015.7107489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Estimation of the aggregate interference is required in order to predict the performance of a wireless system in its working environment. Body Area Networks (BANs) for healthcare applications are becoming a reality, allowing patients to be monitored continuously without forcing them to stay in bed or in hospital. The increasing number of wireless medical devices makes the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band particularly crowded. If new smart BANs have to correctly operate in hospital, coexistence with the existing wireless devices must be accurately investigated, starting with studying the interference in the operating frequency band. The intensity of the interference is strongly related to the chosen threshold, which defines if a received sample has to be categorized as interference or noise. Adaptive threshold methods outperform the non-adaptive ones, due to flexibility and robustness. Among the adaptive threshold methods, the forward consecutive mean excision (FCME) is one of the most attractive, since it is blind, computationally simple and efficient. When applied to large data set, it may require too long time to be computed, thus median filtering has been proposed (med-FCME). In this paper we compare the performance of fixed vs adaptive threshold methods. The two methods are applied to a set of real measurements taken in a modern city hospital over one week.
医院环境下ISM波段综合干扰评价的阈值设置
为了预测无线系统在其工作环境中的性能,需要对干扰总量进行估计。用于医疗保健应用的身体区域网络(ban)正在成为现实,允许患者在不强迫他们卧床或住院的情况下进行连续监测。越来越多的无线医疗设备使得ISM(工业、科学和医疗)频段特别拥挤。如果新的智能ban要在医院正常运行,就必须准确地研究与现有无线设备的共存,从研究工作频段的干扰开始。干扰的强度与选择的阈值密切相关,该阈值定义了接收到的样本是否必须归类为干扰或噪声。自适应阈值方法具有灵活性和鲁棒性,优于非自适应阈值方法。在自适应阈值法中,前向连续均值切除法(FCME)具有盲目性、计算简单、高效等优点,是最具吸引力的方法之一。当应用于大数据集时,可能需要太长的计算时间,因此提出了中值滤波(med-FCME)。本文比较了固定阈值和自适应阈值方法的性能。将这两种方法应用于某现代城市医院一周内的一组实际测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信