Design for mental health: can design promote human-centred diagnostics?

Lars Veldmeijer, G. Terlouw, J. V. ‘. Veer, J. van Os, N. Boonstra
{"title":"Design for mental health: can design promote human-centred diagnostics?","authors":"Lars Veldmeijer, G. Terlouw, J. V. ‘. Veer, J. van Os, N. Boonstra","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2023.2171223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many have suggested different ways of conceptualizing mental health conditions in mental health services. However, eliciting the unicity of the individual experience of mental health conditions in the diagnostic process remains challenging. In this position paper, we describe the diagnostic process in psychiatry and outline three challenges for which insights from the design research paradigm, in particular so-called generative sessions, may represent an opportunity for innovation. We suggest that by implementing generative sessions, conversations about individual experience can be initiated, the focus on diagnostic categories can be shifted towards personal variation, and the integration of empirical evidence of recovery can be facilitated. Therefore, we argue that exploring generative sessions in the diagnostic process can stimulate incremental and iterative advancements in diagnostic systems. To test its hypothesized impact on clinical practice, we recommend several directions for further research in co-creation with traditional mental health professionals, people with mental health conditions, and people with lived experience.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"96 1","pages":"5 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2023.2171223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Many have suggested different ways of conceptualizing mental health conditions in mental health services. However, eliciting the unicity of the individual experience of mental health conditions in the diagnostic process remains challenging. In this position paper, we describe the diagnostic process in psychiatry and outline three challenges for which insights from the design research paradigm, in particular so-called generative sessions, may represent an opportunity for innovation. We suggest that by implementing generative sessions, conversations about individual experience can be initiated, the focus on diagnostic categories can be shifted towards personal variation, and the integration of empirical evidence of recovery can be facilitated. Therefore, we argue that exploring generative sessions in the diagnostic process can stimulate incremental and iterative advancements in diagnostic systems. To test its hypothesized impact on clinical practice, we recommend several directions for further research in co-creation with traditional mental health professionals, people with mental health conditions, and people with lived experience.
精神卫生设计:设计能促进以人为本的诊断吗?
许多人提出了心理健康服务中心理健康状况概念化的不同方法。然而,在诊断过程中引出精神健康状况的个人经验的独特性仍然具有挑战性。在这篇意见书中,我们描述了精神病学的诊断过程,并概述了设计研究范式的见解所面临的三个挑战,特别是所谓的生成会议,可能代表着创新的机会。我们建议,通过实施生成式会议,可以启动关于个人经验的对话,将诊断类别的重点转向个人差异,并促进康复经验证据的整合。因此,我们认为在诊断过程中探索生成会话可以刺激诊断系统的增量和迭代进步。为了验证其对临床实践的假设影响,我们推荐了与传统精神卫生专业人员、有精神健康状况的人和有生活经验的人进行共同创造的几个进一步研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信