Comparison of the Impact on the Extubation Between Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Obese Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy

Chunlu Zhang, Delong Zeng, Lu Chen, Wei-kang Wang, Peng Chen
{"title":"Comparison of the Impact on the Extubation Between Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Obese Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy","authors":"Chunlu Zhang, Delong Zeng, Lu Chen, Wei-kang Wang, Peng Chen","doi":"10.12783/dtmse/amsee2017/14299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Comparison of the impact on the extubation between desflurane and sevoflurane in obese patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Method: A total number of 60 obesity cases aging between 32~60 were selected, randomly divided into 2 groups, named Desflurane Group (30 cases) and SevofluraneGroup(30cases). Patients were required for anesthesia detection. Penehyclidine 0.5mg. Induction of anesthesia was 1ED95 rocuronium bromide 0.3 mg/kg, midazolam 2mg, propofol 2 mg/kg and sufentanil 0.5 μg/kg.The drugs facilitate tracheal intubation with nerve monitoring function and mechanical ventilation, tidal volume 8~10ml/kg, respiratory rate12/min. Maintained the anesthesia with 1.2~1.4 MAC of desflurane or sevoflurane. Stopping medication after surgery. We recorded the OAA/S scores at 5min, 10min, 20min and 30min later after extubation and Riker agitation sedation scores. SPSS 20.0 software was used to analysis results. Results: Compared with sevoflurane, desflurane has a certain clinical application advantages applying in obese patients with nerve monitoring complexity thyroidectomy, showing short recovery and extubation time obviously. But desflurane showed a higher incidence of postoperative agitation than sevoflurane.","PeriodicalId":11124,"journal":{"name":"DEStech Transactions on Materials Science and Engineering","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEStech Transactions on Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12783/dtmse/amsee2017/14299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of the impact on the extubation between desflurane and sevoflurane in obese patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Method: A total number of 60 obesity cases aging between 32~60 were selected, randomly divided into 2 groups, named Desflurane Group (30 cases) and SevofluraneGroup(30cases). Patients were required for anesthesia detection. Penehyclidine 0.5mg. Induction of anesthesia was 1ED95 rocuronium bromide 0.3 mg/kg, midazolam 2mg, propofol 2 mg/kg and sufentanil 0.5 μg/kg.The drugs facilitate tracheal intubation with nerve monitoring function and mechanical ventilation, tidal volume 8~10ml/kg, respiratory rate12/min. Maintained the anesthesia with 1.2~1.4 MAC of desflurane or sevoflurane. Stopping medication after surgery. We recorded the OAA/S scores at 5min, 10min, 20min and 30min later after extubation and Riker agitation sedation scores. SPSS 20.0 software was used to analysis results. Results: Compared with sevoflurane, desflurane has a certain clinical application advantages applying in obese patients with nerve monitoring complexity thyroidectomy, showing short recovery and extubation time obviously. But desflurane showed a higher incidence of postoperative agitation than sevoflurane.
地氟醚与七氟醚对肥胖甲状腺切除术患者拔管效果的比较
目的:比较地氟醚与七氟醚对肥胖甲状腺切除术患者拔管效果的影响。方法:选取年龄在32~60岁的肥胖患者60例,随机分为地氟醚组(30例)和七氟醚组(30例)。患者需进行麻醉检测。Penehyclidine 0.5毫克。麻醉诱导剂量为1ED95,罗库溴铵0.3 mg/kg,咪达唑仑2mg,异丙酚2mg /kg,舒芬太尼0.5 μg/kg。该药有利于具有神经监测功能的气管插管及机械通气,潮气量8~10ml/kg,呼吸频率12次/min。以地氟醚或七氟醚1.2~1.4 MAC维持麻醉。手术后停止用药。分别记录拔管后5min、10min、20min、30min的OAA/S评分和Riker躁动镇静评分。采用SPSS 20.0软件对结果进行分析。结果:地氟醚与七氟醚相比,应用于神经监测复杂性甲状腺切除术的肥胖患者具有一定的临床应用优势,恢复时间短,拔管时间短。但地氟醚术后躁动发生率高于七氟醚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信