Income Tax Reconstruction on Construction Services to Support Development in Indonesia

IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Henry Dianto Pardamean Sinaga
{"title":"Income Tax Reconstruction on Construction Services to Support Development in Indonesia","authors":"Henry Dianto Pardamean Sinaga","doi":"10.47556/j.wjemsd.19.1-2.2023.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The rapid development of construction companies is still dominated by various illegal acts, including bribery, embezzlement, and fraud; this means that the correct tax income will not be reported to the tax office. It is necessary to produce a reconstruction of the income tax provisions on development-based construction services. Design/methodology/approach: This paper applied a normative juridical method with an evaluative and prescriptive thought. Findings: The applicable income tax regulations on Construction Services have not been able to overcome various illegal acts, such as fictitious sub-contractors, fictitious work units, replacement or deterioration of material quality, transfer of lump-sum costs to material costs, tender collusion, personal use of project equipment, and money laundering. Research limitations/implications: This paper would benefit from an in-depth study using a socio-legal approach. However, it can enrich subsequent empirical research. Originality/value: It is important and urgent to renew the income tax law in overcoming existing fraud on Construction Services, including the regulation of the Construction Industry Schemes obligations together with sanctions for each violation, revocation of final income tax on construction services, and the obligation to use the percentage-of-completion method in construction services whose project completion exceeds a financial year.","PeriodicalId":45381,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47556/j.wjemsd.19.1-2.2023.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The rapid development of construction companies is still dominated by various illegal acts, including bribery, embezzlement, and fraud; this means that the correct tax income will not be reported to the tax office. It is necessary to produce a reconstruction of the income tax provisions on development-based construction services. Design/methodology/approach: This paper applied a normative juridical method with an evaluative and prescriptive thought. Findings: The applicable income tax regulations on Construction Services have not been able to overcome various illegal acts, such as fictitious sub-contractors, fictitious work units, replacement or deterioration of material quality, transfer of lump-sum costs to material costs, tender collusion, personal use of project equipment, and money laundering. Research limitations/implications: This paper would benefit from an in-depth study using a socio-legal approach. However, it can enrich subsequent empirical research. Originality/value: It is important and urgent to renew the income tax law in overcoming existing fraud on Construction Services, including the regulation of the Construction Industry Schemes obligations together with sanctions for each violation, revocation of final income tax on construction services, and the obligation to use the percentage-of-completion method in construction services whose project completion exceeds a financial year.
印尼建筑业所得税重组以支持发展
目的:快速发展的建筑公司仍然充斥着各种违法行为,包括贿赂、贪污、欺诈等;这意味着正确的税收收入将不会报告给税务局。有必要对以开发为基础的建筑服务业的所得税规定进行重构。设计/方法论/方法:本文采用了一种规范性的司法方法,具有评估性和规范性的思想。研究发现:现行《建筑业所得税管理条例》未能有效遏制虚假分包商、虚假单位、更换或劣化材料质量、一次性成本转成材料成本、串通投标、个人使用工程设备、洗钱等违法行为。研究局限/启示:本文将受益于使用社会法律方法的深入研究。但是,它可以丰富后续的实证研究。原创性/价值:为了克服现有的建筑服务欺诈行为,更新所得税法是非常重要和紧迫的,包括规范建筑业计划的义务以及对每次违规行为的制裁,撤销建筑服务的最终所得税,以及在工程完成超过一个财政年度的建筑服务中使用完工百分比法的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信