Policies in Support of Lending Following the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

K. Budnik, I. Dimitrov, Johannes Groß, Martina Jančoková, M. Lampe, Bianca Sorvillo, Anze Stular, M. Volk
{"title":"Policies in Support of Lending Following the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic","authors":"K. Budnik, I. Dimitrov, Johannes Groß, Martina Jančoková, M. Lampe, Bianca Sorvillo, Anze Stular, M. Volk","doi":"10.2866/864527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at the impact of mitigation policies implemented by supervisory and macroprudential authorities as well as national governments in the euro area during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to support lending to the real economy. The impact assessment concerns joint, and individual, effect of supervisory measures introduced by the ECB Banking Supervision, a reduction in macroprudential buffers put forward by national macroprudential authorities, and public moratoria and guarantee schemes. The analysis has been conducted in the first half of 2020, in a situation of high uncertainty about how the crisis will develop in the future. Against this backdrop, it proposes a method of addressing such uncertainty by assessing the impact of policies across a full range of scenarios. We find that the supervisory, macroprudential and government policies should have helped to maintain higher lending to the non-financial private sector (around 5% higher than lending in the absence of policy measures) and, in particular, to non-financial corporations (12% higher than lending in the absence of policy measures), preventing further amplification of the recession via the banking sector. The national and supervisory and macroprudential actions have reinforced each other, and have been jointly able to affect a broader share of the banking sector.","PeriodicalId":10548,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2866/864527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper looks at the impact of mitigation policies implemented by supervisory and macroprudential authorities as well as national governments in the euro area during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to support lending to the real economy. The impact assessment concerns joint, and individual, effect of supervisory measures introduced by the ECB Banking Supervision, a reduction in macroprudential buffers put forward by national macroprudential authorities, and public moratoria and guarantee schemes. The analysis has been conducted in the first half of 2020, in a situation of high uncertainty about how the crisis will develop in the future. Against this backdrop, it proposes a method of addressing such uncertainty by assessing the impact of policies across a full range of scenarios. We find that the supervisory, macroprudential and government policies should have helped to maintain higher lending to the non-financial private sector (around 5% higher than lending in the absence of policy measures) and, in particular, to non-financial corporations (12% higher than lending in the absence of policy measures), preventing further amplification of the recession via the banking sector. The national and supervisory and macroprudential actions have reinforced each other, and have been jointly able to affect a broader share of the banking sector.
冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行后的贷款支持政策
本文研究了在冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间,欧元区监管和宏观审慎当局以及各国政府实施的缓解政策对支持实体经济贷款的影响。影响评估涉及欧洲央行银行监管局(ECB Banking Supervision)引入的监管措施、国家宏观审慎当局提出的宏观审慎缓冲的减少以及公共暂停和担保计划的联合和个人影响。该分析是在2020年上半年进行的,当时对未来危机将如何发展存在高度不确定性。在此背景下,它提出了一种通过评估政策在各种情况下的影响来解决这种不确定性的方法。我们发现,监管、宏观审慎和政府政策本应有助于维持对非金融私营部门的更高贷款(在没有政策措施的情况下,比贷款高出约5%),特别是对非金融企业的贷款(在没有政策措施的情况下,比贷款高出12%),从而防止经济衰退通过银行业进一步扩大。国家、监管和宏观审慎行动相互加强,共同能够影响更广泛的银行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信