The Relationships between Frailty and Quality of Life in Elderly Women with Breast Cancer

B. Depboylu, N. Ozturk, B. Niğdelioğlu, G. Discigil
{"title":"The Relationships between Frailty and Quality of Life in Elderly Women with Breast Cancer","authors":"B. Depboylu, N. Ozturk, B. Niğdelioğlu, G. Discigil","doi":"10.30683/1927-7229.2022.11.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is well known that oncologic management of elderly patients is complicated, and physicians should well define the ultimate goals when choosing treatment modalities. Cancer treatment should not necessarily focus on survival but aim for a good quality of life for the patient in light of their frailty. \nPatients and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional survey study. One hundred fifty-eight women with breast cancer participated in this study. The PRISMA-7 Frailty Index and WHOQOL-OLD Module assessed participants’ frailty and quality of life. SPSS 26.0 and Medcalc 14 [Acacialaan 22, B-8400 Ostend, Belgium] programs were used for statistical analyses. Statistically significant associations between the PRISMA-7 scale and the WHOQOL-OLD Module were assessed. \nResults: Of the158 participants, the median age [min-max] was 71 [65-96] years, and 61.2% had stage I and II breast cancer. Lumpectomy was 61.1%, and 75% received chemotherapy-radiotherapy and hormone therapy. For the WHOQOL-OLD domains; financial status [p=0.001] with the sensory ability domain, work status [p<0.001] and education status[p=0.004] with the autonomy domain, education status [p=0.002] with PPF activity domain, education status [p=0.001] and work status [p=0.007] with the social participation domain, treatment modality [p=0.003] with death &dying domain, number of comorbidities [p=0.004] with intimacy domain statistically significant. The total score was associated with education status [p=0.005] and the number of comorbidities [p=0.010]. Frailty correlated positively with age [cut-off age 68 years; p<0.001]. Education status was inversely associated with increased frailty [p=0.003]. The relationship between the PRISMA-7 scale and the WHOQOL-OLD Module correlated negatively in five out of six dimensions except for the Intimacy domain. \nConclusions: It is necessary to design customized cancer management programs to improve specific components of elderly women with breast cancer with increased frailty by revealing the associations in domains of QoL.","PeriodicalId":14957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30683/1927-7229.2022.11.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is well known that oncologic management of elderly patients is complicated, and physicians should well define the ultimate goals when choosing treatment modalities. Cancer treatment should not necessarily focus on survival but aim for a good quality of life for the patient in light of their frailty. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional survey study. One hundred fifty-eight women with breast cancer participated in this study. The PRISMA-7 Frailty Index and WHOQOL-OLD Module assessed participants’ frailty and quality of life. SPSS 26.0 and Medcalc 14 [Acacialaan 22, B-8400 Ostend, Belgium] programs were used for statistical analyses. Statistically significant associations between the PRISMA-7 scale and the WHOQOL-OLD Module were assessed. Results: Of the158 participants, the median age [min-max] was 71 [65-96] years, and 61.2% had stage I and II breast cancer. Lumpectomy was 61.1%, and 75% received chemotherapy-radiotherapy and hormone therapy. For the WHOQOL-OLD domains; financial status [p=0.001] with the sensory ability domain, work status [p<0.001] and education status[p=0.004] with the autonomy domain, education status [p=0.002] with PPF activity domain, education status [p=0.001] and work status [p=0.007] with the social participation domain, treatment modality [p=0.003] with death &dying domain, number of comorbidities [p=0.004] with intimacy domain statistically significant. The total score was associated with education status [p=0.005] and the number of comorbidities [p=0.010]. Frailty correlated positively with age [cut-off age 68 years; p<0.001]. Education status was inversely associated with increased frailty [p=0.003]. The relationship between the PRISMA-7 scale and the WHOQOL-OLD Module correlated negatively in five out of six dimensions except for the Intimacy domain. Conclusions: It is necessary to design customized cancer management programs to improve specific components of elderly women with breast cancer with increased frailty by revealing the associations in domains of QoL.
老年乳腺癌妇女衰弱与生活质量的关系
背景:众所周知,老年患者的肿瘤治疗是复杂的,医生在选择治疗方式时应明确最终目标。癌症治疗不应该只关注生存,而应该着眼于病人的生活质量,考虑到他们的虚弱。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性横断面调查研究。158名患有乳腺癌的女性参与了这项研究。prism -7衰弱指数和WHOQOL-OLD模块评估参与者的衰弱和生活质量。采用SPSS 26.0和Medcalc 14 [Acacialaan 22, B-8400 Ostend, Belgium]程序进行统计分析。评估PRISMA-7量表与WHOQOL-OLD模块之间的统计学显著相关性。结果:在158名参与者中,中位年龄[min-max]为71岁[65-96]岁,61.2%为I期和II期乳腺癌。乳房肿瘤切除术占61.1%,75%接受化疗放疗和激素治疗。对于WHOQOL-OLD域名;经济状况[p=0.001]与感觉能力域有关,工作状况[p<0.001]和教育状况[p=0.004]与自主性域有关,教育状况[p=0.002]与PPF活动域有关,教育状况[p=0.001]和工作状况[p=0.007]与社会参与域有关,治疗方式[p=0.003]与死亡和临终域有关,合并症数量[p=0.004]与亲密域有关。总分与教育程度[p=0.005]、合并症数[p=0.010]相关。虚弱与年龄呈正相关[截止年龄68岁;p < 0.001)。受教育程度与虚弱程度增加呈负相关[p=0.003]。PRISMA-7量表与WHOQOL-OLD模块在6个维度中除亲密度领域外,其余5个维度呈负相关。结论:有必要通过揭示生活质量各领域的关联,设计个性化的癌症管理方案,以改善老年乳腺癌虚弱加重患者的特定组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信