The drums of war are beating louder: Media coverage of brown bears in Romania

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Andra Claudia Neagu, Steluta Manolache, L. Rozylowicz
{"title":"The drums of war are beating louder: Media coverage of brown bears in Romania","authors":"Andra Claudia Neagu, Steluta Manolache, L. Rozylowicz","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.50.86019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing demand for resources to meet the needs of our society has transformed the environment and increased the likelihood of human-wildlife interactions. Romania has the highest density of brown bears in Europe, with more than 7000 individuals populating the Carpathian Mountains and neighboring areas. The large brown bear population in Romania inhabits ever-increasing human-dominated landscapes, which frequently results in conflict with humans. The means and frequency by which the media communicates information to the readership influence the public perception of human-wildlife conflicts. This research is intended to contribute to the existing knowledge on human-brown bear coexistence in Romania by (1) exploring how the Romanian media depicts human-brown bear interactions in terms of the main themes discussed, framing of issues (emotions and key messages), and likely impacts on public perception; (2) analyzing the changes in reporting on human brown-bear interactions following the transition of the legal status of the brown bear from game to strictly protected species; and (3) investigating suggested policy and management solutions. The results indicate that news stories related to brown bears became common in Romanian mass media after 2016, when a provisional one-year ban on culling was instated, after which it increased abruptly in 2021, following the whistleblowing of an alleged trophy hunting event. The focus on human-bear interaction and hunting/poaching themes has not changed; however, the position of the media toward brown bears has become increasingly negative, even when presenting news stories covering human-bear interactions that incur no harm. To facilitate human-brown bear coexistence in Romania, scientists and practitioners should communicate with media representatives and provide a supplementary context for news stories. Evidence-informed news can help authorities better understand conflicts and create bottom-up pathways toward an optimistic future for brown bears and Romanian society.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.50.86019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The increasing demand for resources to meet the needs of our society has transformed the environment and increased the likelihood of human-wildlife interactions. Romania has the highest density of brown bears in Europe, with more than 7000 individuals populating the Carpathian Mountains and neighboring areas. The large brown bear population in Romania inhabits ever-increasing human-dominated landscapes, which frequently results in conflict with humans. The means and frequency by which the media communicates information to the readership influence the public perception of human-wildlife conflicts. This research is intended to contribute to the existing knowledge on human-brown bear coexistence in Romania by (1) exploring how the Romanian media depicts human-brown bear interactions in terms of the main themes discussed, framing of issues (emotions and key messages), and likely impacts on public perception; (2) analyzing the changes in reporting on human brown-bear interactions following the transition of the legal status of the brown bear from game to strictly protected species; and (3) investigating suggested policy and management solutions. The results indicate that news stories related to brown bears became common in Romanian mass media after 2016, when a provisional one-year ban on culling was instated, after which it increased abruptly in 2021, following the whistleblowing of an alleged trophy hunting event. The focus on human-bear interaction and hunting/poaching themes has not changed; however, the position of the media toward brown bears has become increasingly negative, even when presenting news stories covering human-bear interactions that incur no harm. To facilitate human-brown bear coexistence in Romania, scientists and practitioners should communicate with media representatives and provide a supplementary context for news stories. Evidence-informed news can help authorities better understand conflicts and create bottom-up pathways toward an optimistic future for brown bears and Romanian society.
The战鼓更响了:罗马尼亚媒体报道棕熊事件
为了满足我们社会的需求,对资源的需求不断增加,这改变了环境,增加了人类与野生动物互动的可能性。罗马尼亚是欧洲棕熊密度最高的国家,喀尔巴阡山脉和邻近地区有7000多只棕熊。罗马尼亚大量的棕熊居住在日益增加的人类主导的景观中,这经常导致与人类的冲突。媒体向读者传播信息的方式和频率影响公众对人类与野生动物冲突的看法。本研究旨在通过(1)探索罗马尼亚媒体如何在讨论的主题、问题框架(情感和关键信息)以及对公众感知的可能影响方面描述人类与棕熊的互动,从而为罗马尼亚人类与棕熊共存的现有知识做出贡献;(2)分析棕熊法律地位从野生动物转变为严格保护物种后,人类与棕熊互动报道的变化;(3)调查建议的政策和管理方案。结果表明,2016年之后,与棕熊有关的新闻报道在罗马尼亚大众媒体上变得普遍起来,当时实施了为期一年的临时禁令,之后在2021年,在一次所谓的战利品狩猎事件曝光后,这一新闻报道突然增加。对人熊互动和狩猎/偷猎主题的关注并没有改变;然而,媒体对棕熊的态度变得越来越消极,即使在报道没有造成伤害的人熊互动的新闻报道时也是如此。为了促进罗马尼亚人与棕熊的共存,科学家和从业者应该与媒体代表沟通,并为新闻报道提供补充背景。基于证据的新闻可以帮助当局更好地理解冲突,并为棕熊和罗马尼亚社会创造自下而上的乐观未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信