Segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 艺术学 0 ART
DIGITAL CREATIVITY Pub Date : 2022-04-22 Print Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2022.2.SPINE2281
Athan G Zavras, Navya Dandu, Michael T Nolte, Alexander J Butler, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, T Barrett Sullivan, Matthew W Colman
{"title":"Segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Athan G Zavras, Navya Dandu, Michael T Nolte, Alexander J Butler, Vincent P Federico, Arash J Sayari, T Barrett Sullivan, Matthew W Colman","doi":"10.3171/2022.2.SPINE2281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As an alternative procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) facilitates direct neural decompression and disc height restoration while also preserving cervical spine kinematics. To date, few studies have reported long-term functional outcomes after TDA. This paper reports the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis that investigated how segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative level is maintained with long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and MEDLINE were queried for all published studies pertaining to cervical TDA. The methodology for screening adhered strictly to the PRISMA guidelines. All English-language prospective studies that reported ROM preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and/or at long-term follow-up of 5 years or more were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 to test data for statistical heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. The mean differences (MDs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 8 reported the long-term outcomes of 944 patients with an average (range) follow-up of 99.86 (60-142) months and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between preoperative segmental ROM and segmental ROM at 1-year follow-up (MD 0.91°, 95% CI -1.25° to 3.07°, p = 0.410). After the exclusion of 1 study from the comparison between preoperative and 1-year ROM owing to significant statistical heterogeneity according to the sensitivity analysis, ROM significantly improved at 1 year postoperatively (MD 1.92°, 95% CI 1.04°-2.79°, p < 0.001). However, at longer-term follow-up, the authors again found no difference with preoperative segmental ROM, and no study was excluded on the basis of the results of further sensitivity analysis (MD -0.22°, 95% CI -1.69° to -1.23°, p = 0.760). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in ROM from 1 year postoperatively to final long-term follow-up (MD -0.77°, 95% CI -1.29° to -0.24°, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Segmental ROM was found to initially improve beyond preoperative values for as long as 1 year postoperatively, but then ROM deteriorated back to values consistent with preoperative motion at long-term follow-up. Although additional studies with further longitudinal follow-up are needed, these findings further support the notion that cervical TDA may successfully maintain physiological spinal kinematics over the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":54180,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL CREATIVITY","volume":"19 1","pages":"579-587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL CREATIVITY","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.2.SPINE2281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As an alternative procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) facilitates direct neural decompression and disc height restoration while also preserving cervical spine kinematics. To date, few studies have reported long-term functional outcomes after TDA. This paper reports the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis that investigated how segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative level is maintained with long-term follow-up.

Methods: PubMed and MEDLINE were queried for all published studies pertaining to cervical TDA. The methodology for screening adhered strictly to the PRISMA guidelines. All English-language prospective studies that reported ROM preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and/or at long-term follow-up of 5 years or more were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 to test data for statistical heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. The mean differences (MDs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

Results: Of the 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 8 reported the long-term outcomes of 944 patients with an average (range) follow-up of 99.86 (60-142) months and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between preoperative segmental ROM and segmental ROM at 1-year follow-up (MD 0.91°, 95% CI -1.25° to 3.07°, p = 0.410). After the exclusion of 1 study from the comparison between preoperative and 1-year ROM owing to significant statistical heterogeneity according to the sensitivity analysis, ROM significantly improved at 1 year postoperatively (MD 1.92°, 95% CI 1.04°-2.79°, p < 0.001). However, at longer-term follow-up, the authors again found no difference with preoperative segmental ROM, and no study was excluded on the basis of the results of further sensitivity analysis (MD -0.22°, 95% CI -1.69° to -1.23°, p = 0.760). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in ROM from 1 year postoperatively to final long-term follow-up (MD -0.77°, 95% CI -1.29° to -0.24°, p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Segmental ROM was found to initially improve beyond preoperative values for as long as 1 year postoperatively, but then ROM deteriorated back to values consistent with preoperative motion at long-term follow-up. Although additional studies with further longitudinal follow-up are needed, these findings further support the notion that cervical TDA may successfully maintain physiological spinal kinematics over the long term.

颈椎全椎间盘关节置换术后长期随访的节段活动范围:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:作为颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术的替代手术,全椎间盘关节成形术(TDA)可直接为神经减压和恢复椎间盘高度,同时还能保持颈椎的运动学特性。迄今为止,很少有研究报告 TDA 术后的长期功能效果。本文报告了一项系统性综述和荟萃分析的结果,该分析调查了在长期随访中如何保持手术水平的节段运动范围(ROM):方法:查询了 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 上所有已发表的与颈椎 TDA 相关的研究。筛选方法严格遵守 PRISMA 指南。所有报告了术前、术后 1 年和/或长期随访 5 年或以上的 ROM 的英文前瞻性研究均被纳入。使用 Cochran's Q 和 I2 进行荟萃分析,以检验数据的统计异质性,在这种情况下使用随机效应模型。报告了平均差异(MDs)和相关的 95% 置信区间(CIs):在符合纳入标准的 12 项研究中,有 8 项研究报告了 944 名患者的长期疗效,平均随访时间(范围)为 99.86(60-142)个月,并纳入了荟萃分析。术前节段ROM与随访1年时节段ROM之间没有差异(MD 0.91°,95% CI -1.25° 至 3.07°,P = 0.410)。根据敏感性分析,在术前与术后1年的ROM比较中,由于存在显著的统计学异质性,因此排除了一项研究,但术后1年的ROM显著改善(MD 1.92°,95% CI 1.04°-2.79°,p < 0.001)。然而,在长期随访中,作者再次发现与术前节段ROM没有差异,并且没有研究根据进一步的敏感性分析结果被排除在外(MD -0.22°,95% CI -1.69° to -1.23°, p = 0.760)。相反,从术后1年到最终长期随访期间,ROM明显下降(MD -0.77°,95% CI -1.29° to -0.24°,p = 0.004):结论:研究发现,在术后长达 1 年的时间里,节段 ROM 最初的改善程度超过了术前值,但在长期随访时,ROM 又恶化回术前值。虽然还需要进行更多的纵向随访研究,但这些发现进一步支持了颈椎 TDA 可以成功地长期保持脊柱的生理运动学这一观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Digital Creativity is a major peer-reviewed journal at the intersection of the creative arts, design and digital technologies. It publishes articles of interest to those involved in the practical task and theoretical aspects of making or using digital media in creative disciplines. These include but are not limited to visual arts, interaction design, physical computing and making, computational materials, textile and fashion design, filmmaking and animation, game design, music, dance, drama, architecture and urban design. The following list, while not exhaustive, indicates a range of topics that fall within the scope of the journal: * New insights through the use of digital media in the creative process * The relationships between practice, research and technology * The design and making of digital artefacts and environments * Interaction relationships between digital media and audience / public * Everyday experience with digital design and artwork * Aspects of digital media and storytelling * Theoretical concepts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信