Brazilian Government Action in the Strengthening and Dismantling of MERCOSUR’s Family Farming Institutionality

C. Grisa, Caio Galvão de França, P. Niederle, Silvia A. Zimmermann
{"title":"Brazilian Government Action in the Strengthening and Dismantling of MERCOSUR’s Family Farming Institutionality","authors":"C. Grisa, Caio Galvão de França, P. Niederle, Silvia A. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1590/s0102-8529.20224403e20210024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article analyses the changes in the Brazilian government’s actions at the Specialized Meeting on Family Farming of Mercosur (REAF). Created in 2004, REAF is a regional forum for political dialogue between governments and social organizations to develop public policies for family farming. Drawing on dialogues between historical neo-institutionalism and debates on policy paradigm and dismantling, the article defines four dimensions (political context and power relations, ideas and policy paradigms, characteristics of institutions, and interests and strategies of political actors) to explain and typify the processes of institutional strengthening and dismantling. Based on such dimensions and on data collected through participant observation, document analysis and interviews with key actors, the article analyses the Brazilian government’s actions in comparison to prevailing types of institutional change. The analysis shows that, between 2004 and 2016, the prevailing strategy for institutional strengthening was ‘discursive and symbolic’ and operated through ‘institutional densification’; in turn, from 2016 on, strategies of ‘discursive and symbolic’ dismantling and ‘dismantling by change in the institutional linkages’ prevailed.","PeriodicalId":30003,"journal":{"name":"Contexto Internacional","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contexto Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.20224403e20210024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article analyses the changes in the Brazilian government’s actions at the Specialized Meeting on Family Farming of Mercosur (REAF). Created in 2004, REAF is a regional forum for political dialogue between governments and social organizations to develop public policies for family farming. Drawing on dialogues between historical neo-institutionalism and debates on policy paradigm and dismantling, the article defines four dimensions (political context and power relations, ideas and policy paradigms, characteristics of institutions, and interests and strategies of political actors) to explain and typify the processes of institutional strengthening and dismantling. Based on such dimensions and on data collected through participant observation, document analysis and interviews with key actors, the article analyses the Brazilian government’s actions in comparison to prevailing types of institutional change. The analysis shows that, between 2004 and 2016, the prevailing strategy for institutional strengthening was ‘discursive and symbolic’ and operated through ‘institutional densification’; in turn, from 2016 on, strategies of ‘discursive and symbolic’ dismantling and ‘dismantling by change in the institutional linkages’ prevailed.
巴西政府在加强和废除南方共同市场家庭农业体制方面的行动
摘要本文分析了巴西政府在南方共同市场家庭农业专题会议(REAF)上的行动变化。REAF成立于2004年,是政府和社会组织之间进行政治对话的区域论坛,旨在制定家庭农业的公共政策。本文借鉴历史上新制度主义与政策范式和解体辩论之间的对话,定义了四个维度(政治背景和权力关系、思想和政策范式、制度特征、政治行为者的利益和战略)来解释和典型制度强化和解体的过程。基于这些维度,以及通过参与者观察、文件分析和对关键参与者的访谈收集的数据,本文分析了巴西政府的行动,并将其与主流的制度变革类型进行了比较。分析表明,在2004年至2016年期间,制度强化的主流战略是“话语和象征”,并通过“制度致密化”来运作;反过来,从2016年开始,“话语和符号”拆除和“通过制度联系的变化拆除”的策略盛行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信