Una historia desnuda. Subjetividad, autoría y discurso histórico en la temprana modernidad.

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Cesc Esteve Mestre
{"title":"Una historia desnuda. Subjetividad, autoría y discurso histórico en la temprana modernidad.","authors":"Cesc Esteve Mestre","doi":"10.12795/ph.2019.v33.i02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A theoretical debate took place in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries between those in favour of a ‘naked’ historical writing, deprived of assessments and rhetorical devices, and those in favour of a more traditional idea of history, in which the author’s opinions and eloquence were considered of great value and key to history’s moral and political instruction. Important issues regarding the nature and duties of history were involved in this debate, which also had a significant impact on the idea of the historian as an author and on subjectivity and bias in historical narrative. In this article I will consider these particular aspects of the debate in the theoretical treatises written by Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose (1651) and Pierre Le Moyne (1670).","PeriodicalId":36202,"journal":{"name":"Philologia Hispalensis","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologia Hispalensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/ph.2019.v33.i02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A theoretical debate took place in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries between those in favour of a ‘naked’ historical writing, deprived of assessments and rhetorical devices, and those in favour of a more traditional idea of history, in which the author’s opinions and eloquence were considered of great value and key to history’s moral and political instruction. Important issues regarding the nature and duties of history were involved in this debate, which also had a significant impact on the idea of the historian as an author and on subjectivity and bias in historical narrative. In this article I will consider these particular aspects of the debate in the theoretical treatises written by Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose (1651) and Pierre Le Moyne (1670).
赤裸裸的故事。早期现代性的主体性、作者身份与历史话语。
在16世纪和17世纪,一场理论辩论发生在赞成“赤裸裸”的历史写作,剥夺了评估和修辞手段的人,以及赞成更传统的历史观念的人之间,在这种观念中,作者的观点和雄辩被认为是具有巨大价值的,是历史道德和政治指导的关键。这场辩论涉及历史的性质和责任等重要问题,这也对历史学家作为作者的观念以及历史叙述中的主观性和偏见产生了重大影响。在这篇文章中,我将考虑在Agostino Mascardi (1636), Jeronimo de San Jose(1651)和Pierre Le Moyne(1670)所写的理论论文中争论的这些特定方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philologia Hispalensis
Philologia Hispalensis Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信