Unraveling the Collision of Rigid Religious Mindsets: Towards ‘Cross-Religious Tabernacling’ within a Praxis of Interpathetic Transspection in Pastoral Caregiving – a Hermeneutical Approach

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
D. Louw
{"title":"Unraveling the Collision of Rigid Religious Mindsets: Towards ‘Cross-Religious Tabernacling’ within a Praxis of Interpathetic Transspection in Pastoral Caregiving – a Hermeneutical Approach","authors":"D. Louw","doi":"10.7833/121-1-2063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of global pluralism and cultural diversity, religions can and should play a decisive role in creating safe spaces for meaningful encounters and interreligious dialogue in pastoral and interpathetic caregiving. In this regard, a hermeneutic of networking understanding should be rendered critical for promoting meaningful interreligious dialoguing because enmity, prejudice and suspicion, fed by rigid doctrinal stances and autocratic forms of rather imperialistic God-images, contribute in most cases to schismatic estrangement, as well as static, paralyzing thinking (stringent mindsets). In order to contribute to constructive forms of crossing over to the religious other, it is argued that David Augsburger’s notion of interpathetic care (1986) should supplement the traditional understanding of the cure/care of human souls (cura animarum). To foster a culture of mutual exchange of paradigmatic convictions, a diagnostic chart is developed. The argument is that a comprehensive framework of conceptional and cognitive networking (patterns of thinking) opens up new vistas, i.e., on seeing the ‘bigger picture’. It is further argued that a theological and religious understanding of ‘tabernacling’ could help to create concrete, communal spaces for significant interreligious encounters and interfaith cooperation. Keywords: Apathy, Cross-religious tabernacling, Diagnostic chart, Interpathetic caregiving, Schemata of interpretation, Transspection, Presencing as mode of compassionate being-there","PeriodicalId":44409,"journal":{"name":"Scriptura-International Journal of Bible Religion and Theology in Southern Africa","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scriptura-International Journal of Bible Religion and Theology in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7833/121-1-2063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the context of global pluralism and cultural diversity, religions can and should play a decisive role in creating safe spaces for meaningful encounters and interreligious dialogue in pastoral and interpathetic caregiving. In this regard, a hermeneutic of networking understanding should be rendered critical for promoting meaningful interreligious dialoguing because enmity, prejudice and suspicion, fed by rigid doctrinal stances and autocratic forms of rather imperialistic God-images, contribute in most cases to schismatic estrangement, as well as static, paralyzing thinking (stringent mindsets). In order to contribute to constructive forms of crossing over to the religious other, it is argued that David Augsburger’s notion of interpathetic care (1986) should supplement the traditional understanding of the cure/care of human souls (cura animarum). To foster a culture of mutual exchange of paradigmatic convictions, a diagnostic chart is developed. The argument is that a comprehensive framework of conceptional and cognitive networking (patterns of thinking) opens up new vistas, i.e., on seeing the ‘bigger picture’. It is further argued that a theological and religious understanding of ‘tabernacling’ could help to create concrete, communal spaces for significant interreligious encounters and interfaith cooperation. Keywords: Apathy, Cross-religious tabernacling, Diagnostic chart, Interpathetic caregiving, Schemata of interpretation, Transspection, Presencing as mode of compassionate being-there
解读僵化宗教思维的碰撞:在牧灵关怀的互情观察实践中走向“跨宗教的帐棚”——一种解释学方法
在全球多元化和文化多样性的背景下,宗教能够也应该发挥决定性作用,在牧灵和相互关怀中为有意义的相遇和宗教间对话创造安全空间。在这方面,对相互联系的理解的解释对于促进有意义的宗教间对话是至关重要的,因为由严格的教义立场和相当帝国主义的上帝形象的专制形式所助长的敌意、偏见和怀疑,在大多数情况下造成分裂的隔阂,以及静止的、瘫痪的思维(严格的心态)。为了促进跨界到宗教他者的建设性形式,David Augsburger的互感关怀(1986)的概念应该补充对人类灵魂治疗/关怀(cura animarum)的传统理解。为了培养相互交流范例信念的文化,制定了诊断图表。论点是,概念和认知网络(思维模式)的综合框架开辟了新的前景,即看到“更大的画面”。进一步认为,神学和宗教对“住棚”的理解有助于为重要的宗教间接触和宗教间合作创造具体的公共空间。关键词:冷漠、跨宗教搭帐、诊断表、互情关怀、解释图式、检视、作为慈悲存在模式的临在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信