Soil δ15N is a better indicator of ecosystem nitrogen cycling than plant δ15N: A global meta-analysis

4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
K. Liao, X. Lai, Q. Zhu
{"title":"Soil δ15N is a better indicator of ecosystem nitrogen cycling than plant δ15N: A global meta-analysis","authors":"K. Liao, X. Lai, Q. Zhu","doi":"10.5194/soil-7-733-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The nitrogen-15 (15N) natural abundance composition\n(δ15N) in soils or plants is a useful tool to indicate the\nopenness of ecosystem N cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the\ninfluence of the experimental warming on soil and plant δ15N.\nWe applied a global meta-analysis method to synthesize 79 and 76 paired\nobservations of soil and plant δ15N from 20 published studies,\nrespectively. Results showed that the mean effect sizes of the soil and\nplant δ15N under experimental warming were −0.524 (95 % CI (confidence interval):\n−0.987 to −0.162) and 0.189 (95 % CI: −0.210 to 0.569), respectively. This\nindicated that soil δ15N had negative response to warming at\nthe global scale, where warming had no significant effect on plant δ15N. Experimental warming significantly (p<0.05) decreased\nsoil δ15N in Alkali and medium-textured soils, in\ngrassland/meadow, under air warming, for a 4–10-year warming period and for an\nincrease of >3 ∘C in temperature, whereas it significantly\n(p<0.05) increased soil δ15N in neutral and\nfine-textured soils and for an increase of 1.5–3 ∘C in temperature.\nPlant δ15N significantly (p<0.05) increased with\nincreasing temperature in neutral and fine-textured soils and significantly\n(p<0.05) decreased in alkali soil. Latitude did not affect the\nwarming effects on both soil and plant δ15N. However, the\nwarming effect on soil δ15N was positively controlled by the\nmean annual temperature, which is related to the fact that the higher\ntemperature can strengthen the activity of soil microbes. The effect of\nwarming on plant δ15N had weaker relationships with\nenvironmental variables compared with that on soil δ15N. This\nimplied that soil δ15N was more effective than plant δ15N in indicating the openness of global ecosystem N cycling.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-733-2021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. The nitrogen-15 (15N) natural abundance composition (δ15N) in soils or plants is a useful tool to indicate the openness of ecosystem N cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the experimental warming on soil and plant δ15N. We applied a global meta-analysis method to synthesize 79 and 76 paired observations of soil and plant δ15N from 20 published studies, respectively. Results showed that the mean effect sizes of the soil and plant δ15N under experimental warming were −0.524 (95 % CI (confidence interval): −0.987 to −0.162) and 0.189 (95 % CI: −0.210 to 0.569), respectively. This indicated that soil δ15N had negative response to warming at the global scale, where warming had no significant effect on plant δ15N. Experimental warming significantly (p<0.05) decreased soil δ15N in Alkali and medium-textured soils, in grassland/meadow, under air warming, for a 4–10-year warming period and for an increase of >3 ∘C in temperature, whereas it significantly (p<0.05) increased soil δ15N in neutral and fine-textured soils and for an increase of 1.5–3 ∘C in temperature. Plant δ15N significantly (p<0.05) increased with increasing temperature in neutral and fine-textured soils and significantly (p<0.05) decreased in alkali soil. Latitude did not affect the warming effects on both soil and plant δ15N. However, the warming effect on soil δ15N was positively controlled by the mean annual temperature, which is related to the fact that the higher temperature can strengthen the activity of soil microbes. The effect of warming on plant δ15N had weaker relationships with environmental variables compared with that on soil δ15N. This implied that soil δ15N was more effective than plant δ15N in indicating the openness of global ecosystem N cycling.
土壤δ15N比植物δ15N更能反映生态系统氮循环
摘要土壤或植物中氮-15 (15N)自然丰度组成(δ15N)是反映生态系统氮循环开放性的有效工具。本研究旨在评价试验增温对土壤和植物δ15N的影响。采用全球meta分析方法,对20篇已发表的土壤和植物δ15N的79和76个成对观测结果进行了综合。结果表明,实验增温条件下土壤和植物δ15N的平均效应值分别为- 0.524 (95% CI: - 0.987 ~ - 0.162)和0.189 (95% CI: - 0.210 ~ 0.569)。这表明在全球尺度上,土壤δ15N对全球变暖有负响应,而全球变暖对植物δ15N没有显著影响。实验升温显著(p3°C),而在中性和细质土壤中显著(p<0.05)增加土壤δ15N,并使温度增加1.5-3°C。中性和细粒土壤植物δ15N随温度升高显著(p<0.05)升高,碱土植物δ15N显著(p<0.05)降低。纬度不影响土壤和植物δ15N的增温效应。而对土壤δ15N的增温效应受年平均温度的正控制,这与较高的温度能增强土壤微生物的活性有关。增温对植物δ15N的影响与环境变量的关系弱于对土壤δ15N的影响。这表明土壤δ15N比植物δ15N更能反映全球生态系统氮循环的开放性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Science
Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science. Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信