Assessing the Impact of Safety Countermeasures on Dilemma Zones at Signalized Intersections of Urban Roads: a Driving Simulator Study

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION
A. Calvi
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Safety Countermeasures on Dilemma Zones at Signalized Intersections of Urban Roads: a Driving Simulator Study","authors":"A. Calvi","doi":"10.48295/et.2023.91.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When drivers approach a signalized intersection at the start of the yellow signal, they might be reluctant to decide whether to stop or go through the intersection due to the dilemma zone (DZ), with the consequent risk of improper behaviors that can lead to rear-end collisions and right-angle crashes. The main goal of this research is to analyze the driver's behavior at the onset of the yellow signal and to identify the most effective countermeasures for the resolution of the dilemma zone in order to improve the safety and efficiency of urban signalized intersections. A driving simulator study was carried out, and three different countermeasures were specifically designed and tested: Green Signal Countdown Timers (GSCT) (C1); a new scheme of vertical and horizontal warning signs (C2); and an in-vehicle advanced driving assistance system that uses Augmented Reality (AR) and connected vehicle technologies (C3). Forty-six volunteers took part in the experiments, driving the same scenario four times (three with countermeasures and one as a baseline condition). The results demonstrated that with countermeasure C1, the length of the DZ increased with respect to the baseline condition; moreover, the stop/go drivers’ decisions were found to be more inconsistent, increasing the potential risk of rear-end crashes. Conversely, countermeasures C2 and C3 resulted in a reduction of DZ length (-30.5% and 21.6%, respectively); in addition, C2 was found to be the one that recorded the greatest consistency of drivers’ decision-making behaviors, while C3 provided the drivers with timely and personalized early-stop warnings and recorded fewer wrong behaviors. Based on the results of this study, C2 and C3 countermeasures might be a good way to improve safety and operations at urban signalized intersections and cut down on the number of drivers who aren't sure what to do when the yellow light comes on.","PeriodicalId":45410,"journal":{"name":"European Transport-Trasporti Europei","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport-Trasporti Europei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2023.91.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When drivers approach a signalized intersection at the start of the yellow signal, they might be reluctant to decide whether to stop or go through the intersection due to the dilemma zone (DZ), with the consequent risk of improper behaviors that can lead to rear-end collisions and right-angle crashes. The main goal of this research is to analyze the driver's behavior at the onset of the yellow signal and to identify the most effective countermeasures for the resolution of the dilemma zone in order to improve the safety and efficiency of urban signalized intersections. A driving simulator study was carried out, and three different countermeasures were specifically designed and tested: Green Signal Countdown Timers (GSCT) (C1); a new scheme of vertical and horizontal warning signs (C2); and an in-vehicle advanced driving assistance system that uses Augmented Reality (AR) and connected vehicle technologies (C3). Forty-six volunteers took part in the experiments, driving the same scenario four times (three with countermeasures and one as a baseline condition). The results demonstrated that with countermeasure C1, the length of the DZ increased with respect to the baseline condition; moreover, the stop/go drivers’ decisions were found to be more inconsistent, increasing the potential risk of rear-end crashes. Conversely, countermeasures C2 and C3 resulted in a reduction of DZ length (-30.5% and 21.6%, respectively); in addition, C2 was found to be the one that recorded the greatest consistency of drivers’ decision-making behaviors, while C3 provided the drivers with timely and personalized early-stop warnings and recorded fewer wrong behaviors. Based on the results of this study, C2 and C3 countermeasures might be a good way to improve safety and operations at urban signalized intersections and cut down on the number of drivers who aren't sure what to do when the yellow light comes on.
城市道路信号交叉口困境区安全对策影响评估:驾驶模拟器研究
当驾驶员在黄色信号开始时接近信号交叉口时,由于存在两难区(dilemma zone, DZ),驾驶员可能不愿意决定是停车还是通过交叉口,从而存在行为不当导致追尾和直角碰撞的风险。本研究的主要目的是分析驾驶员在黄色信号开始时的行为,并找出解决困境区的最有效对策,以提高城市信号交叉口的安全性和效率。通过驾驶模拟器研究,具体设计并测试了三种不同的对策:绿色信号倒计时计时器(C1);新的垂直和水平警告标志方案(C2);以及使用增强现实(AR)和车联网技术的车载高级驾驶辅助系统(C3)。46名志愿者参加了实验,驾驶同样的场景四次(三次有对策,一次作为基线条件)。结果表明:在对策C1条件下,DZ的长度相对于基线条件有所增加;此外,停车/走司机的决定更不一致,增加了追尾事故的潜在风险。相反,C2和C3使DZ长度减少(分别减少30.5%和21.6%);此外,C2记录的驾驶员决策行为一致性最高,而C3为驾驶员提供了及时、个性化的早停预警,记录的错误行为较少。基于本研究的结果,C2和C3对策可能是提高城市信号交叉口安全和运营的好方法,并减少当黄灯亮起时不知道该怎么做的司机的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信