Electronic Literature by Scott Rettberg (review)

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Steve Tomasula
{"title":"Electronic Literature by Scott Rettberg (review)","authors":"Steve Tomasula","doi":"10.1353/mfs.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"folk practices with cutting-edge research” (183). While noting that Joyce found Russell’s concerns for food security in times of war and emphasis on older farming techniques to be tainted with nationalist mythologizing, Martell also acknowledges Russell’s agriculturally informed expertise. In contrast to Russell, Joyce’s characters enjoy imported “weak tea” (195) and “sugared white bread,” thumbing their nose at “Revitalist milk drinkers” like Russell. Martell presents an astute reading of how Ulysses’s infamous penchant for gustatory, abject bodily profusions—in all its rule-breaking, defiant splurge of abundantly inclusive populations—should be read as an example of defying social control to rewrite famine scarcity as profundity. Her analysis of the “‘Oxen’ episode” (202) keenly illustrates how “Joyce triangulates food, birth, and death in an arrangement that positions sterility as slaughter and carnality as life-giving” by using Thomas Carlyle as an ironic speaker who imbues images of vegetables with sterility in contrast to the “red, raw, bleeding” beef fed to expectant mothers. This scene is then related to Odysseus’s sacrifice of divine cattle in defiance of Zeus, allowing Martell to show how these strategies rewrite Irish defiance of the British “gods of empire” (203). Farm to Form’s coda, “From a Morning World,” playfully combines scenes of milking with homages to modern-world pagan presences that appear in multiple authors’ texts, suggesting alternating energies of loss and promise. Using Joyce’s homophones mourning and morning as touchstones, Martell reminds us that the fraught modernist struggles with industrial food production, control, and farming resilience are poignantly relevant today. Indeed, the cultural and literary revelations within Farm to Table provide important insight for contemporary readers as we reckon with the capitalist forces mandating farming production goals amidst the threat of global climate change and food scarcity.","PeriodicalId":45576,"journal":{"name":"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MFS-Modern Fiction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2022.0022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

folk practices with cutting-edge research” (183). While noting that Joyce found Russell’s concerns for food security in times of war and emphasis on older farming techniques to be tainted with nationalist mythologizing, Martell also acknowledges Russell’s agriculturally informed expertise. In contrast to Russell, Joyce’s characters enjoy imported “weak tea” (195) and “sugared white bread,” thumbing their nose at “Revitalist milk drinkers” like Russell. Martell presents an astute reading of how Ulysses’s infamous penchant for gustatory, abject bodily profusions—in all its rule-breaking, defiant splurge of abundantly inclusive populations—should be read as an example of defying social control to rewrite famine scarcity as profundity. Her analysis of the “‘Oxen’ episode” (202) keenly illustrates how “Joyce triangulates food, birth, and death in an arrangement that positions sterility as slaughter and carnality as life-giving” by using Thomas Carlyle as an ironic speaker who imbues images of vegetables with sterility in contrast to the “red, raw, bleeding” beef fed to expectant mothers. This scene is then related to Odysseus’s sacrifice of divine cattle in defiance of Zeus, allowing Martell to show how these strategies rewrite Irish defiance of the British “gods of empire” (203). Farm to Form’s coda, “From a Morning World,” playfully combines scenes of milking with homages to modern-world pagan presences that appear in multiple authors’ texts, suggesting alternating energies of loss and promise. Using Joyce’s homophones mourning and morning as touchstones, Martell reminds us that the fraught modernist struggles with industrial food production, control, and farming resilience are poignantly relevant today. Indeed, the cultural and literary revelations within Farm to Table provide important insight for contemporary readers as we reckon with the capitalist forces mandating farming production goals amidst the threat of global climate change and food scarcity.
《电子文学》作者:Scott Rettberg(评论)
民间实践与前沿研究”(183)。马泰尔指出,乔伊斯发现罗素对战争时期粮食安全的关注和对古老农业技术的强调带有民族主义神话色彩,但他也承认罗素在农业方面的专业知识。与罗素形成鲜明对比的是,乔伊斯笔下的人物喜欢进口的“淡茶”(1995)和“加糖的白面包”,对罗素这样的“喝牛奶的人”嗤之以鼻。马泰尔对尤利西斯臭名昭著的嗜好进行了精辟的解读,他对味觉、卑鄙的身体奢靡——在所有这些违反规则的、充满包容性的人群中肆无忌惮的挥霍——应该被解读为藐视社会控制、将饥荒的匮乏改写为深刻的一个例子。她对“‘牛’那一集”(202)的分析敏锐地说明了“乔伊斯如何将食物、出生和死亡三角化,将无菌定位为屠杀,将肉欲定位为赋予生命”,她使用托马斯·卡莱尔(Thomas Carlyle)作为讽刺的演讲者,将蔬菜的无菌形象与喂给孕妇的“红色、生的、流血的”牛肉形成鲜明对比。这一场景随后与奥德修斯(Odysseus)为反抗宙斯(Zeus)而牺牲神牛有关,这让马泰尔(Martell)展示了这些策略如何改写了爱尔兰人对英国“帝国之神”的蔑视(203)。《从农场到形式》(Farm to Form)的结尾,“来自一个清晨的世界”(From a Morning World),将挤奶的场景与对现代世界异教存在的敬意顽皮地结合在一起,这些场景出现在多位作者的文本中,暗示了失去与希望交替的能量。马泰尔用乔伊斯的同音异义词“哀悼”和“早晨”作为试金石,提醒我们现代主义者与工业化食品生产、控制和农业弹性的斗争在今天有着深刻的意义。事实上,《从农场到餐桌》中的文化和文学启示为当代读者提供了重要的见解,因为我们在全球气候变化和粮食短缺的威胁下,考虑到资本主义力量强制农业生产目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Modern Fiction Studies publishes engaging articles on prominent works of modern and contemporary fiction. Emphasizing historical, theoretical, and interdisciplinary approaches, the journal encourages a dialogue between fiction and theory, publishing work that offers new theoretical insights, clarity of style, and completeness of argument. Modern Fiction Studies alternates general issues dealing with a wide range of texts with special issues focused on single topics or individual writers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信