{"title":"A Note on C² Interpreted over Finite Data-Words","authors":"Bartosz Bednarczyk, Piotr Witkowski","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the satisfiability problem for the two-variable fragment of first-order logic extended with counting quantifiers, interpreted over finite words with data, denoted here with C2[≤, succ,∼, πbin ]. In our scenario, we allow for using arbitrary many uninterpreted binary predicates from πbin, two navigational predicates ≤ and succ over word positions as well as a data-equality predicate ∼. We prove that the obtained logic is undecidable, which contrasts with the decidability of the logic without counting by Montanari, Pazzaglia and Sala [27]. We supplement our results with decidability for several sub-fragments of C2[≤, succ,∼, πbin], e.g. without binary predicates, without successor succ, or under the assumption that the total number of positions carrying the same data value in a data-word is bounded by an a priori given constant. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Logic and verification","PeriodicalId":75226,"journal":{"name":"Time","volume":"27 1","pages":"17:1-17:14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2020.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We consider the satisfiability problem for the two-variable fragment of first-order logic extended with counting quantifiers, interpreted over finite words with data, denoted here with C2[≤, succ,∼, πbin ]. In our scenario, we allow for using arbitrary many uninterpreted binary predicates from πbin, two navigational predicates ≤ and succ over word positions as well as a data-equality predicate ∼. We prove that the obtained logic is undecidable, which contrasts with the decidability of the logic without counting by Montanari, Pazzaglia and Sala [27]. We supplement our results with decidability for several sub-fragments of C2[≤, succ,∼, πbin], e.g. without binary predicates, without successor succ, or under the assumption that the total number of positions carrying the same data value in a data-word is bounded by an a priori given constant. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Logic and verification