Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia, ChatGPT, and a controversial medicolegal milestone

Purvish M. Parikh, Dinesh M. Shah, Kairav P. Parikh
{"title":"Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia, ChatGPT, and a controversial medicolegal milestone","authors":"Purvish M. Parikh, Dinesh M. Shah, Kairav P. Parikh","doi":"10.25259/ijms_31_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has revolutionized how we perceive artificial intelligence (AI).: Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia created history by mentioning its use while passing judgment about an autistic child and payment for his medical treatment by his insurance company. The use of AI is not new and is helping the judiciary system in many ways. However, this judgment given on January 30, 2023, has ignited controversy among Judge Garcia’s peers and the global community (a Google search produced more than 70 million hits on February 5, 2023). EU has established guidelines that are to be followed before calling any AI tool trustworthy. This requires stringent compliance with the verification and due diligence process. In this instance, ChatGPT was used within 2 months of its launch, even when it has been shown to give incomplete, incorrect, and misleading answers in many instances. Hasty adaption of unproven technology, however good it may be, should not be our path. This might fuel the misguided fear amongst people about robots taking over from human judges.","PeriodicalId":13277,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical sciences","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_31_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has revolutionized how we perceive artificial intelligence (AI).: Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia created history by mentioning its use while passing judgment about an autistic child and payment for his medical treatment by his insurance company. The use of AI is not new and is helping the judiciary system in many ways. However, this judgment given on January 30, 2023, has ignited controversy among Judge Garcia’s peers and the global community (a Google search produced more than 70 million hits on February 5, 2023). EU has established guidelines that are to be followed before calling any AI tool trustworthy. This requires stringent compliance with the verification and due diligence process. In this instance, ChatGPT was used within 2 months of its launch, even when it has been shown to give incomplete, incorrect, and misleading answers in many instances. Hasty adaption of unproven technology, however good it may be, should not be our path. This might fuel the misguided fear amongst people about robots taking over from human judges.
胡安·曼努埃尔·帕迪拉·加西亚法官,ChatGPT,以及一个有争议的医学里程碑
聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)彻底改变了我们对人工智能(AI)的看法。当前位置法官胡安·曼努埃尔·帕迪拉·加西亚(Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia)在对一名自闭症儿童及其保险公司支付医疗费用的案件作出判决时,提到了它的使用,创造了历史。人工智能的使用并不新鲜,它在很多方面都在帮助司法系统。然而,这一判决于2023年1月30日作出,在加西亚法官的同行和全球社会中引发了争议(2023年2月5日,谷歌搜索产生了7000多万次点击)。在称任何人工智能工具值得信赖之前,欧盟已经制定了需要遵循的指导方针。这需要严格遵守核查和尽职调查过程。在这个例子中,ChatGPT在发布后2个月内就被使用了,即使它在许多情况下给出了不完整、不正确和误导性的答案。仓促采用未经验证的技术,不管它有多好,都不应该成为我们的道路。这可能会加剧人们对机器人取代人类法官的错误恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信