Examining organization and provider challenges with the adoption of virtual domestic violence and sexual assault interventions in Alberta, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
S. Montesanti, Winta Ghidei, Peter H. Silverstone, Lana Wells, Suzanne Squires, Allan Bailey
{"title":"Examining organization and provider challenges with the adoption of virtual domestic violence and sexual assault interventions in Alberta, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"S. Montesanti, Winta Ghidei, Peter H. Silverstone, Lana Wells, Suzanne Squires, Allan Bailey","doi":"10.1177/13558196221078796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives In Canada, calls to domestic violence and sexual assault hotlines increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as stricter public health restrictions took effect in parts of the country. Moreover, the public health measures introduced to limit the transmission of COVID-19 saw many health providers abruptly pivot to providing services virtually, with little to no opportunity to plan for this switch. We carried out a qualitative research study to understand the resulting challenges experienced by providers of domestic violence and sexual assault support services. Methods Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather in-depth information from service providers and organizational leaders in the Canadian province of Alberta about the challenges they experienced adopting virtual and remote-based domestic violence and sexual assault interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak. Interview transcripts and field notes were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results Our findings highlighted multiple challenges organizations, service providers and clients experienced. These included: (1) systemic (macro-level) challenges pertaining to policies, legislation and funding availability, (2) organization and provider (meso-level) challenges related to adapting services and programmes online or for remote delivery and (3) provider perceptions of client (micro-level) challenges related to accessing virtual interventions. Conclusions Equity-focused policy and intersectional and systemic action are needed to enhance delivery and access to virtual interventions and services for domestic violence and sexual assault clients.","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"34 1","pages":"169 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196221078796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives In Canada, calls to domestic violence and sexual assault hotlines increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as stricter public health restrictions took effect in parts of the country. Moreover, the public health measures introduced to limit the transmission of COVID-19 saw many health providers abruptly pivot to providing services virtually, with little to no opportunity to plan for this switch. We carried out a qualitative research study to understand the resulting challenges experienced by providers of domestic violence and sexual assault support services. Methods Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather in-depth information from service providers and organizational leaders in the Canadian province of Alberta about the challenges they experienced adopting virtual and remote-based domestic violence and sexual assault interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak. Interview transcripts and field notes were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results Our findings highlighted multiple challenges organizations, service providers and clients experienced. These included: (1) systemic (macro-level) challenges pertaining to policies, legislation and funding availability, (2) organization and provider (meso-level) challenges related to adapting services and programmes online or for remote delivery and (3) provider perceptions of client (micro-level) challenges related to accessing virtual interventions. Conclusions Equity-focused policy and intersectional and systemic action are needed to enhance delivery and access to virtual interventions and services for domestic violence and sexual assault clients.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,通过在加拿大阿尔伯塔省采用虚拟家庭暴力和性侵犯干预措施,研究组织和提供者面临的挑战
在加拿大,随着更严格的公共卫生限制在该国部分地区生效,2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,家庭暴力和性侵犯热线的电话有所增加。此外,为限制COVID-19传播而采取的公共卫生措施使许多卫生服务提供者突然转向提供虚拟服务,几乎没有机会为这种转变制定计划。我们进行了一项定性研究,以了解家庭暴力和性侵犯支持服务提供者所面临的挑战。方法对加拿大阿尔伯塔省的服务提供者和组织领导进行24次半结构化访谈,深入了解他们在2019冠状病毒病疫情期间采用虚拟和远程家庭暴力和性侵犯干预措施所面临的挑战。访谈笔录和实地记录采用专题分析方法进行了分析。我们的研究结果突出了组织、服务提供商和客户所面临的多重挑战。这些挑战包括:(1)与政策、立法和资金可用性有关的系统性(宏观层面)挑战;(2)组织和提供商(中观层面)挑战,涉及调整在线或远程交付的服务和方案;(3)提供商对客户的看法(微观层面)挑战,涉及获取虚拟干预措施。结论:需要采取以公平为重点的政策以及交叉和系统的行动,以加强对家庭暴力和性侵犯客户的虚拟干预和服务的提供和获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信