The practice in applying and ways to improve criteria for establishing the degree of occupational disability in the territory of the Russian Federation

M. Sevastianov, Севастьянов Михаил Александрович, G. Penina, Пенина Галина Олеговна, I. Dedeneva, Деденева Ирина Владимировна, N. Chistyakova, Чистякова Наталья Петровна, I. Bozhkov, Божков Игорь Александрович
{"title":"The practice in applying and ways to improve criteria for establishing the degree of occupational disability in the territory of the Russian Federation","authors":"M. Sevastianov, Севастьянов Михаил Александрович, G. Penina, Пенина Галина Олеговна, I. Dedeneva, Деденева Ирина Владимировна, N. Chistyakova, Чистякова Наталья Петровна, I. Bozhkov, Божков Игорь Александрович","doi":"10.17816/kmj2020-544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess the practice in applying “Temporary criteria of determination of extent of loss of professional wor­king capacity” currently in force in various constituent entities of the Russian Federation and to substantiate the main directions for their improvement. Methods. The analysis of expert decisions to establish the degree of occupational disability, adopted in the pe­riod from 2015 to 2017, was carried out in 77 subjects of the Russian Federation for two nosological forms: (1) consequences of lower limb injuries (T93) and (2) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (H83.3). A comparative analysis of expert decisions made using current and proposed by the authors’ criteria in 2 constituent entities of the Russian Federation in 2018 was carried out. For data analysis, we used descriptive statistics methods. Results. Taking into account a high variability in expert decisions making in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for similar cases (coefficient of variation 21.6%), the authors conclude that it is necessary to change approaches to the methodology for assessing the type of professional activity (qualifications, quality and volume of work, ability to perform it). Using the authors propose criteria based on the concept of reasonable accommodation allowed us to significantly reduce the variability of the decisions made in the “pilot” regions, the coefficient of variation decreased from 21.25 to 7.43%. Conclusion. High variability of decisions made during the examination of the degree of occupational disability is associated with the imperfection of the methods and criteria for assessing the victim's professional activities; the use of the criteria proposed by the authors allows for a higher reproducibility of the results of the examinations.","PeriodicalId":17798,"journal":{"name":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2020-544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To assess the practice in applying “Temporary criteria of determination of extent of loss of professional wor­king capacity” currently in force in various constituent entities of the Russian Federation and to substantiate the main directions for their improvement. Methods. The analysis of expert decisions to establish the degree of occupational disability, adopted in the pe­riod from 2015 to 2017, was carried out in 77 subjects of the Russian Federation for two nosological forms: (1) consequences of lower limb injuries (T93) and (2) bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (H83.3). A comparative analysis of expert decisions made using current and proposed by the authors’ criteria in 2 constituent entities of the Russian Federation in 2018 was carried out. For data analysis, we used descriptive statistics methods. Results. Taking into account a high variability in expert decisions making in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation for similar cases (coefficient of variation 21.6%), the authors conclude that it is necessary to change approaches to the methodology for assessing the type of professional activity (qualifications, quality and volume of work, ability to perform it). Using the authors propose criteria based on the concept of reasonable accommodation allowed us to significantly reduce the variability of the decisions made in the “pilot” regions, the coefficient of variation decreased from 21.25 to 7.43%. Conclusion. High variability of decisions made during the examination of the degree of occupational disability is associated with the imperfection of the methods and criteria for assessing the victim's professional activities; the use of the criteria proposed by the authors allows for a higher reproducibility of the results of the examinations.
在俄罗斯联邦境内适用确定职业残疾程度标准的做法和改进标准的方法
的目标。评估目前在俄罗斯联邦各组成实体中适用“确定专业工作能力丧失程度的临时标准”的做法,并确定改进这些标准的主要方向。方法。对俄罗斯联邦77名受试者进行了2015年至2017年期间通过的确定职业残疾程度的专家决策分析,分为两种病种:(1)下肢损伤后果(T93)和(2)双侧感音神经性听力损失(H83.3)。对2018年在俄罗斯联邦的两个组成实体中使用作者现有标准和建议的标准做出的专家决策进行了比较分析。对于数据分析,我们使用描述性统计方法。结果。考虑到俄罗斯联邦各组成实体在类似情况下专家决策的高度可变性(变异系数21.6%),作者得出结论,有必要改变评估专业活动类型(资格、工作质量和工作量、执行能力)的方法。利用作者提出的基于合理调节概念的标准,我们可以显著降低“试点”地区决策的变异性,变异系数从21.25下降到7.43%。结论。在检查职业残疾程度期间所作决定的高度可变性与评估受害者专业活动的方法和标准不完善有关;使用作者提出的标准可以提高检查结果的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信