Extended Editorial: Quality in Higher Education Author Survey

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Quality in Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/13538322.2022.2153642

L. Harvey

引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. In your experience, has the quality of higher education improved or deteriorated during the time you have been researching higher education? (Please give reasons for your answer.) 2. Do you think that students have a better or a worse learning experience now than when you first started researching higher education? (Please give reasons for your answer.) 3. To what extent have quality assurance proctesses affected the quality of higher education?

查看原文本刊更多论文

延伸社论:高等教育质量作者调查

1. 根据你的经验，在你研究高等教育的这段时间里，高等教育的质量是提高了还是下降了?(请给出你的答案的理由。)你认为与你刚开始研究高等教育时相比，现在学生的学习体验是更好还是更差?(请给出你的答案的理由。)质量保证过程在多大程度上影响了高等教育的质量?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quality in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Quality in Higher Education is aimed at those interested in the theory, practice and policies relating to the control, management and improvement of quality in higher education. The journal is receptive to critical, phenomenological as well as positivistic studies. The journal would like to publish more studies that use hermeneutic, semiotic, ethnographic or dialectical research as well as the more traditional studies based on quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews and focus groups. Papers that have empirical research content are particularly welcome. The editor especially wishes to encourage papers on: reported research results, especially where these assess the impact of quality assurance systems, procedures and methodologies; theoretical analyses of quality and quality initiatives in higher education; comparative evaluation and international aspects of practice and policy with a view to identifying transportable methods, systems and good practice; quality assurance and standards monitoring of transnational higher education; the nature and impact and student feedback; improvements in learning and teaching that impact on quality and standards; links between quality assurance and employability; evaluations of the impact of quality procedures at national level, backed up by research evidence.