Money laundering, media and European banks

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Markus Tiemann
{"title":"Money laundering, media and European banks","authors":"Markus Tiemann","doi":"10.1108/jmlc-02-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to assess, from an empirical perspective, the research question if public media reports which relate concrete banks to concrete allegations of money laundering have an adverse impact on banks stock prices and what are the drivers of such impact?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper makes use of event study methodology and uses the constant mean and the market model. The event window is calibrated towards a five-day window, and the estimation window has a length of 90 days, in line with best academic practices. Drivers are identified by correlation analysis. and the market model uses ordinary least squares regression.\n\n\nFindings\nThe application of event study methodologies yields the results that stock prices of affected banks generate, at the date of the news appearance, statistically significant negative abnormal returns under both the market model and the constant mean model. As negative abnormal returns have been mainly found at the date of the event itself, the findings confirm that the impacts of money laundering may be severe but short natured. In addition, the paper finds that the identified negative abnormal returns may be driven by the banks’ size in terms of total assets, by the bank’s profitability in terms of return on assets and by the bank’s sustainability risk.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings have implications in terms of banking and supervisory practices. In specific, the findings help to argue that banking consolidation is needed to lower the impacts of AML cases, as stock prices of larger banks show less sensitivity. In addition, the findings could be used to determine financial sanctions against banks violating AML regulation. Finally, the findings imply that AML news can have severe and fast-moving financial stability considerations and are, therefore, important in crisis situations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs there appears to be no substantial research that applies event study methodology to the money laundering context, the combination of research question and methodology has an innovative character. In addition, there is no clear literature on media and money laundering.\n","PeriodicalId":46042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-02-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to assess, from an empirical perspective, the research question if public media reports which relate concrete banks to concrete allegations of money laundering have an adverse impact on banks stock prices and what are the drivers of such impact? Design/methodology/approach The paper makes use of event study methodology and uses the constant mean and the market model. The event window is calibrated towards a five-day window, and the estimation window has a length of 90 days, in line with best academic practices. Drivers are identified by correlation analysis. and the market model uses ordinary least squares regression. Findings The application of event study methodologies yields the results that stock prices of affected banks generate, at the date of the news appearance, statistically significant negative abnormal returns under both the market model and the constant mean model. As negative abnormal returns have been mainly found at the date of the event itself, the findings confirm that the impacts of money laundering may be severe but short natured. In addition, the paper finds that the identified negative abnormal returns may be driven by the banks’ size in terms of total assets, by the bank’s profitability in terms of return on assets and by the bank’s sustainability risk. Practical implications The findings have implications in terms of banking and supervisory practices. In specific, the findings help to argue that banking consolidation is needed to lower the impacts of AML cases, as stock prices of larger banks show less sensitivity. In addition, the findings could be used to determine financial sanctions against banks violating AML regulation. Finally, the findings imply that AML news can have severe and fast-moving financial stability considerations and are, therefore, important in crisis situations. Originality/value As there appears to be no substantial research that applies event study methodology to the money laundering context, the combination of research question and methodology has an innovative character. In addition, there is no clear literature on media and money laundering.
洗钱,媒体和欧洲银行
本文旨在评估,从实证的角度来看,研究问题,如果公共媒体报道涉及具体银行洗钱的具体指控对银行股价产生不利影响,这种影响的驱动因素是什么?设计/方法/途径本文采用事件研究法,采用常均值和市场模型。事件窗口被校准为五天窗口,估计窗口的长度为90天,符合最佳学术实践。通过相关分析识别驱动因素。市场模型采用普通最小二乘回归。应用事件研究方法得出的结果是,在新闻出现之日,受影响银行的股价在市场模型和常均值模型下都产生了统计上显著的负异常收益。由于负异常收益主要出现在事件发生当日,因此研究结果证实,洗钱的影响可能是严重的,但是短期的。此外,本文发现所识别的负异常收益可能受到银行总资产规模、银行资产回报率盈利能力和银行可持续性风险的驱动。实际意义研究结果对银行和监管实践具有启示意义。具体而言,研究结果有助于证明,为了降低“反洗钱”案件的影响,需要进行银行业整合,因为大型银行的股价表现出较低的敏感性。此外,调查结果可用于确定对违反“反洗钱”规定的银行的金融制裁。最后,研究结果表明,“反洗钱”新闻可能具有严重和快速变化的金融稳定因素,因此在危机情况下非常重要。原创性/价值虽然似乎没有将事件研究方法应用于洗钱语境的实质性研究,但研究问题与研究方法的结合具有创新性。此外,也没有关于媒体与洗钱的明确文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Journal of Money Laundering Control CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信