The language of school writing: a developmental comparison of genres across the school years

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Leah Haim, D. Ravid
{"title":"The language of school writing: a developmental comparison of genres across the school years","authors":"Leah Haim, D. Ravid","doi":"10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is the highway to learning, processing, organizing, storing and retrieving information during the school years. Gaining command of the structures and functions of texts of different genres is one of the main goals of linguistic literacy in education. The texts that school-goers construct provide optimal hunting grounds for unveiling their linguistic abilities during the genre-specific construction of different text types. The current study examines the linguistic constructions typical of expository texts, characterized by argumentation or persuasion regarding social / conceptual issues, versus informative texts, describing factual (or less controversial) phenomena. This examination constitutes a window on Hebrew-speaking students’ developing writing abilities in elementary, middle and high school, compared with adults. Participants were 547 students and educated adults with post-high school education. Each participant wrote an informative text and an expository text, yielding a total of 1,094 texts. Three types of variables were examined: lexical, morpho-syntactic and syntactic. We found that complex lexicon and syntax in discourse increased in prevalence across the school years, with specific structures being genre-typical as befits the stance and character of the two genres under investigation. We also found that it was only in adulthood that all of these components were employed in optimal fashion, at the culmination of the period of Later Language Development. Our results imply that informative and expository texts are indeed distinct in their characteristics, and that it takes many years of internal linguistic and cognitive development, on the one hand, and schooling instruction and experience, on the other hand, to achieve qualitative academic writing in non-experts.","PeriodicalId":38590,"journal":{"name":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing is the highway to learning, processing, organizing, storing and retrieving information during the school years. Gaining command of the structures and functions of texts of different genres is one of the main goals of linguistic literacy in education. The texts that school-goers construct provide optimal hunting grounds for unveiling their linguistic abilities during the genre-specific construction of different text types. The current study examines the linguistic constructions typical of expository texts, characterized by argumentation or persuasion regarding social / conceptual issues, versus informative texts, describing factual (or less controversial) phenomena. This examination constitutes a window on Hebrew-speaking students’ developing writing abilities in elementary, middle and high school, compared with adults. Participants were 547 students and educated adults with post-high school education. Each participant wrote an informative text and an expository text, yielding a total of 1,094 texts. Three types of variables were examined: lexical, morpho-syntactic and syntactic. We found that complex lexicon and syntax in discourse increased in prevalence across the school years, with specific structures being genre-typical as befits the stance and character of the two genres under investigation. We also found that it was only in adulthood that all of these components were employed in optimal fashion, at the culmination of the period of Later Language Development. Our results imply that informative and expository texts are indeed distinct in their characteristics, and that it takes many years of internal linguistic and cognitive development, on the one hand, and schooling instruction and experience, on the other hand, to achieve qualitative academic writing in non-experts.
学校写作的语言:跨学年体裁的发展比较
在学校里,写作是学习、处理、组织、存储和检索信息的捷径。掌握不同体裁文本的结构和功能是语言素养教育的主要目标之一。学生建构的文本为学生在不同文本类型的体裁建构过程中揭示其语言能力提供了最佳狩猎场。当前的研究考察了解释性文本的典型语言结构,其特征是关于社会/概念问题的论证或说服,而信息性文本则描述事实(或较少争议)现象。这个考试构成了一个窗口,以发展希伯来语学生在小学,初中和高中的写作能力,与成人相比。参与者是547名学生和受过高中以上教育的成年人。每个参与者都写了一篇资料性的文章和一篇说明性的文章,总共有1094篇文章。考察了三种类型的变量:词汇、形态句法和句法。我们发现,在整个学年中,复杂的词汇和句法在语篇中越来越普遍,特定的结构具有体裁典型性,这与被调查的两种体裁的立场和特征相适应。我们还发现,只有在成年期,也就是后期语言发展的巅峰时期,所有这些要素才能以最佳方式得到运用。我们的研究结果表明,信息性和说明性文本的特征确实不同,一方面需要多年的内部语言和认知发展,另一方面需要学校教育和经验,才能在非专家中实现定性的学术写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信