Focus on the dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib in clinical outcome of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ida Ayu Widya Anjani, Anak Agung Bagus Putra Indrakusuma, I. G. K. Arim Sadeva, P. Wulandari, L. M. Rusyati, P. Sudarsa, I. Supadmanaba, D. Wihandani
{"title":"Focus on the dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib in clinical outcome of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ida Ayu Widya Anjani, Anak Agung Bagus Putra Indrakusuma, I. G. K. Arim Sadeva, P. Wulandari, L. M. Rusyati, P. Sudarsa, I. Supadmanaba, D. Wihandani","doi":"10.15562/bdv.v3i2.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Melanoma is the most serious lethal skin cancer, affects the melanin producer cells (melanocytes). Surgery is the most common treatment, whereas for the advance stage the development of a treatment is recommended. BRAF (Dabrafenib and Vemurafenib) inhibitor or MEK inhibitor (Trametinib) is used as the most frequently targeted therapy of melanoma due to more than 80% patient with positive BRAF mutation. In this review, those treatments will be investigated systematically to identify their clinical outcome.Method: This systematic literature review (SLR) was performed from Cochrane, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Pubmed. Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool RoB2 is used to assess RCT studies and New-castle Ottawa Scale Assessment to assess cohort studies by 3 different assessors. Data analysis was carried out by using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). Heterogenicity test was assessed by I2  and Chi2 statisticResult: There are 20 studies used in this article (13 RCT and 7 cohorts). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of study that using targeted therapy (vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib) compare other therapies (chemotherapy, immunotherapy,etc) showed risk ratio (RR) was 1.12 (95%CI 1.07,1.17;  I2=100%; p<0,00001). The OS and PFS with monotherapy compare of vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib with combination therapy showed RR was 1.09 (95%CI.06,1.13;I2=99%; p<0,00001). Conclusion: BRAF and MEK targeted therapy has a good prognosis for a patient with a positive BRAF gene mutation and could be combined with other therapy for a better clinical outcome rather than monotherapy.Keyword: melanoma, dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib","PeriodicalId":8684,"journal":{"name":"Bali Dermatology and Venereology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Dermatology and Venereology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/bdv.v3i2.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Melanoma is the most serious lethal skin cancer, affects the melanin producer cells (melanocytes). Surgery is the most common treatment, whereas for the advance stage the development of a treatment is recommended. BRAF (Dabrafenib and Vemurafenib) inhibitor or MEK inhibitor (Trametinib) is used as the most frequently targeted therapy of melanoma due to more than 80% patient with positive BRAF mutation. In this review, those treatments will be investigated systematically to identify their clinical outcome.Method: This systematic literature review (SLR) was performed from Cochrane, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Pubmed. Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool RoB2 is used to assess RCT studies and New-castle Ottawa Scale Assessment to assess cohort studies by 3 different assessors. Data analysis was carried out by using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). Heterogenicity test was assessed by I2  and Chi2 statisticResult: There are 20 studies used in this article (13 RCT and 7 cohorts). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of study that using targeted therapy (vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib) compare other therapies (chemotherapy, immunotherapy,etc) showed risk ratio (RR) was 1.12 (95%CI 1.07,1.17;  I2=100%; p<0,00001). The OS and PFS with monotherapy compare of vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib with combination therapy showed RR was 1.09 (95%CI.06,1.13;I2=99%; p<0,00001). Conclusion: BRAF and MEK targeted therapy has a good prognosis for a patient with a positive BRAF gene mutation and could be combined with other therapy for a better clinical outcome rather than monotherapy.Keyword: melanoma, dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib
darafenib, vemurafenib和trametinib对黑色素瘤临床结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:黑色素瘤是最严重的致死性皮肤癌,影响黑色素产生细胞(黑素细胞)。手术是最常见的治疗方法,而对于晚期,建议发展治疗方法。BRAF (Dabrafenib和Vemurafenib)抑制剂或MEK抑制剂(Trametinib)被用作黑色素瘤最常用的靶向治疗,因为超过80%的患者BRAF突变阳性。在这篇综述中,这些治疗方法将被系统地研究以确定其临床结果。方法:系统文献综述(SLR)来自Cochrane、Science Direct、Google Scholar和Pubmed。Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool RoB2用于评估RCT研究,New-castle Ottawa Scale Assessment用于评估3位不同评估者的队列研究。使用Review Manager软件(RevMan 5.4)进行数据分析。采用I2 Â和Chi2进行异质性检验。结果:本文共纳入20项研究(13项随机对照试验,7个队列)。使用靶向治疗(vemurafenib, trametinib或dabrafenib)的研究的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)与其他治疗(化疗,免疫治疗等)相比,风险比(RR)为1.12 (95%CI 1.07,1.17;Â I2=100%;p < 0, 00001)。vemurafenib、曲美替尼、达非尼与联合治疗的OS和PFS比较,RR为1.09 (95%CI.06,1.13;I2=99%;p < 0, 00001)。结论:BRAF和MEK靶向治疗BRAF基因突变阳性患者预后较好,与其他治疗联合治疗比单药治疗临床效果更好。关键词:黑色素瘤,达非尼,vemurafenib,曲美替尼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信