Food safety regimes in Scotland, 1899-1914.

M. French, J. Phillips
{"title":"Food safety regimes in Scotland, 1899-1914.","authors":"M. French, J. Phillips","doi":"10.3366/JSHS.2002.22.2.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the authors of this paper was recently discussing the historical literature on inter-war unemployment in Britain with a class of honours students, who were amused by the assertion of the scholar who characterised this as a regional phenomenon, concentrated in ‘Scotland, northern Britain, south Wales and northern Ireland’. Where, wondered the students, was this region called ‘northern Britain’, and what kind of ‘region’ was Scotland? Such eccentric and Anglo-centric conceptualisations of the United Kingdom have perhaps become less pervasive since 1991, when this example was published. The most significant general corrective here has probably been the devolution to Scotland of aspects of political power, but of great importance – when reconfiguring ideas of Britain – in academic and particularly historical circles has been the steady expansion of published research on Scotland’s varied economic, social and political development since the Industrial Revolution. Much of this research has, to an extent, revolved around the question of Scottish particularity – or exceptionalism – within the United Kingdom, and also developed understanding of the huge variety of economic and social conditions in industrial Scotland. These have encompassed differentiated experiences of class, gender and religion, and the contrasting degrees of development between rural and urban society and according to geographical location. In both cases – whether examining Scotland’s position in the Union or different experiences in Scotland – the historical literature has engaged with and, to some extent, under-mined the notion that Scotland can be viewed as a homogeneous economic, social and political ‘region’. Examples of three different kinds of historical writing commonly illustrate this trend: Clive Lee’s 1995 study of the twentieth-century Scottish economy, which places substantial emphasis on the regional as well as sectoral pattern of difference and development; Tom Devine and Richard Finlay’s edited collection of 1996 on the twentieth century, the diversely themed chapters of which bring out the huge variety of life in modern Scotland; and Ian MacDougall’s Voices from Home and Work, published in 2000. Gathering evidence from, inter alia, coal miners, laundresses,","PeriodicalId":88311,"journal":{"name":"Scottish economic & social history","volume":"36 1","pages":"134-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish economic & social history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/JSHS.2002.22.2.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the authors of this paper was recently discussing the historical literature on inter-war unemployment in Britain with a class of honours students, who were amused by the assertion of the scholar who characterised this as a regional phenomenon, concentrated in ‘Scotland, northern Britain, south Wales and northern Ireland’. Where, wondered the students, was this region called ‘northern Britain’, and what kind of ‘region’ was Scotland? Such eccentric and Anglo-centric conceptualisations of the United Kingdom have perhaps become less pervasive since 1991, when this example was published. The most significant general corrective here has probably been the devolution to Scotland of aspects of political power, but of great importance – when reconfiguring ideas of Britain – in academic and particularly historical circles has been the steady expansion of published research on Scotland’s varied economic, social and political development since the Industrial Revolution. Much of this research has, to an extent, revolved around the question of Scottish particularity – or exceptionalism – within the United Kingdom, and also developed understanding of the huge variety of economic and social conditions in industrial Scotland. These have encompassed differentiated experiences of class, gender and religion, and the contrasting degrees of development between rural and urban society and according to geographical location. In both cases – whether examining Scotland’s position in the Union or different experiences in Scotland – the historical literature has engaged with and, to some extent, under-mined the notion that Scotland can be viewed as a homogeneous economic, social and political ‘region’. Examples of three different kinds of historical writing commonly illustrate this trend: Clive Lee’s 1995 study of the twentieth-century Scottish economy, which places substantial emphasis on the regional as well as sectoral pattern of difference and development; Tom Devine and Richard Finlay’s edited collection of 1996 on the twentieth century, the diversely themed chapters of which bring out the huge variety of life in modern Scotland; and Ian MacDougall’s Voices from Home and Work, published in 2000. Gathering evidence from, inter alia, coal miners, laundresses,
苏格兰的食品安全制度,1899-1914。
这篇论文的一位作者最近与一群优等生讨论了关于英国战争期间失业的历史文献,这些学生被这位学者的断言所好笑,他把失业描述为一种地区性现象,集中在“苏格兰、英国北部、南威尔士和北爱尔兰”。学生们想知道,这个被称为“英国北部”的地区是在哪里?苏格兰又是一个什么样的“地区”?自1991年这个例子发表以来,这种古怪的、以盎格鲁为中心的英国概念可能已经不那么普遍了。这里最重要的一般性纠正可能是将政治权力下放给苏格兰,但在重新配置英国观念时,在学术界,尤其是历史学界,非常重要的是,关于苏格兰自工业革命以来各种经济、社会和政治发展的已发表研究的稳步扩大。在某种程度上,这些研究的大部分都是围绕着联合王国内部的苏格兰特殊性(或例外主义)问题展开的,同时也发展了对工业苏格兰各种经济和社会状况的理解。这些差异包括阶级、性别和宗教的不同经历,以及城乡社会和地理位置的不同发展程度。在这两种情况下——无论是考察苏格兰在联邦中的地位,还是考察苏格兰的不同经历——历史文献都与苏格兰可以被视为一个同质的经济、社会和政治“地区”的观念有关,并在某种程度上破坏了这种观念。三种不同类型的历史著作的例子通常说明了这一趋势:克莱夫·李(Clive Lee) 1995年对20世纪苏格兰经济的研究,其中大量强调了区域和部门的差异和发展模式;汤姆·迪瓦恩和理查德·芬利1996年编辑的关于20世纪的合集,其中主题多样的章节展现了现代苏格兰生活的巨大多样性;以及2000年出版的伊恩·麦克杜格尔的《来自家庭和工作的声音》。从煤矿工人,洗衣女工,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信