Systems Integration in Infrastructure Projects: Seven Lessons from Crossrail

IF 1.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
J. Whyte, A. Davies, Christine Sexton
{"title":"Systems Integration in Infrastructure Projects: Seven Lessons from Crossrail","authors":"J. Whyte, A. Davies, Christine Sexton","doi":"10.1680/jmapl.21.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a systems integration model for the delivery of complex infrastructure projects. We argue that the client is ultimately accountable for systems integration in major projects, setting out the responsibilities to ensure that systems integration is successfully accomplished to achieve desired outcomes. From the Crossrail case, we draw seven lessons for clients, to: 1) manage programme delivery as an integration activity; 2) actively manage systems integration; 3) ensure authority to make decisions; 4) maintain configuration control; 5) plan for a lengthy testing and commissioning phase; 6) appreciate supply chain products may be part of unaligned global R&D and development programmes; and 7) do final integration only when there is something to integrate. Central to our argument is the idea that on such complex projects, the client cannot outsource systems integration and thus needs to recognize they retain accountability, though roles and responsibilities can be assigned to the delivery partner, supply chain, chief engineer and/or contracted systems integration firm. A key question for the client at the outset is how to distribute interface management and systems integration responsibilities while retaining accountability and oversight. Rather than managing through contracts, budgets and schedules, we suggest a changed approach with priority given to managing integration, and contracts, budgets and schedules that support and incentivise this.","PeriodicalId":44163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.21.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We propose a systems integration model for the delivery of complex infrastructure projects. We argue that the client is ultimately accountable for systems integration in major projects, setting out the responsibilities to ensure that systems integration is successfully accomplished to achieve desired outcomes. From the Crossrail case, we draw seven lessons for clients, to: 1) manage programme delivery as an integration activity; 2) actively manage systems integration; 3) ensure authority to make decisions; 4) maintain configuration control; 5) plan for a lengthy testing and commissioning phase; 6) appreciate supply chain products may be part of unaligned global R&D and development programmes; and 7) do final integration only when there is something to integrate. Central to our argument is the idea that on such complex projects, the client cannot outsource systems integration and thus needs to recognize they retain accountability, though roles and responsibilities can be assigned to the delivery partner, supply chain, chief engineer and/or contracted systems integration firm. A key question for the client at the outset is how to distribute interface management and systems integration responsibilities while retaining accountability and oversight. Rather than managing through contracts, budgets and schedules, we suggest a changed approach with priority given to managing integration, and contracts, budgets and schedules that support and incentivise this.
基础设施项目中的系统集成:Crossrail的七个经验教训
我们提出了一个复杂基础设施项目交付的系统集成模型。我们认为,客户最终对主要项目中的系统集成负责,设定责任以确保成功完成系统集成以实现期望的结果。从横贯铁路的案例中,我们为客户总结了7条经验教训:1)将项目交付作为一项整合活动来管理;2)积极管理系统集成;3)确保决策权;4)保持配置控制;5)计划一个漫长的测试和调试阶段;6)认识到供应链产品可能是全球研发和发展计划的一部分;只有在需要积分的时候才做最后的积分。我们争论的中心思想是,在这样复杂的项目中,客户不能外包系统集成,因此需要认识到他们保留责任,尽管角色和责任可以分配给交付合作伙伴、供应链、总工程师和/或签约的系统集成公司。客户一开始面临的一个关键问题是,在保留责任和监督的同时,如何分配接口管理和系统集成责任。与其通过合同、预算和时间表进行管理,我们建议采用一种改变的方法,优先考虑管理集成,以及支持和激励集成的合同、预算和时间表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信