HUMAN CONDITION IN A GLOBALIZED SOCIETY OF RISKS AS A SOCIAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEM

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
А. М. Yermolenko
{"title":"HUMAN CONDITION IN A GLOBALIZED SOCIETY OF RISKS AS A SOCIAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEM","authors":"А. М. Yermolenko","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The study aims at thematizing social and ethical problems related to the changes of the human condition in the contemporary globalized society of risks. These risks include threats of not only physical destruction of human race, but also transformation of the natural constitution of the human being. The task of achieving this objective also includes comparative analysis of this problem in the classical and contemporary philosophical anthropology. Theoretical basis. Works of the representatives of the contemporary philosophical anthropology, including the methodology of the transcendental anthropology as discursive ethics. Originality. Contrary to the classical philosophical anthropology, which was based on the concept of the human being as \"unfinished project of nature\", the author suggests a concept of human being as \"unfinishable project of history\" which poses new requirements to the ethics both on the level of its fundamentals, and on the level of its application. Conclusions. The complex globalized world needs axiological and normative re-orientation of the society based upon universalist macroethics of discourse. This macroethics should aim at Letztbegrundung of the moral and ethical imperatives for the future development of society, changes of humanity and its natural constitution.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose. The study aims at thematizing social and ethical problems related to the changes of the human condition in the contemporary globalized society of risks. These risks include threats of not only physical destruction of human race, but also transformation of the natural constitution of the human being. The task of achieving this objective also includes comparative analysis of this problem in the classical and contemporary philosophical anthropology. Theoretical basis. Works of the representatives of the contemporary philosophical anthropology, including the methodology of the transcendental anthropology as discursive ethics. Originality. Contrary to the classical philosophical anthropology, which was based on the concept of the human being as "unfinished project of nature", the author suggests a concept of human being as "unfinishable project of history" which poses new requirements to the ethics both on the level of its fundamentals, and on the level of its application. Conclusions. The complex globalized world needs axiological and normative re-orientation of the society based upon universalist macroethics of discourse. This macroethics should aim at Letztbegrundung of the moral and ethical imperatives for the future development of society, changes of humanity and its natural constitution.
人类在全球化社会中的生存状况是一个社会和伦理问题
目的。该研究旨在将与当代全球化风险社会中人类状况变化有关的社会和伦理问题主题化。这些风险不仅包括对人类的物质毁灭的威胁,而且还包括对人类自然体质的改造。实现这一目标的任务还包括在古典和当代哲学人类学中对这一问题进行比较分析。理论基础。当代哲学人类学的代表作品,包括方法论上的先验人类学作为话语伦理学。创意。与古典哲学人类学将人视为“未完成的自然工程”的观点相反,作者提出了人是“未完成的历史工程”的观点,这一观点无论是在基础层面还是在应用层面都对伦理学提出了新的要求。结论。复杂的全球化世界需要在普遍主义宏观话语伦理的基础上对社会进行价值论和规范性的重新定位。这一宏观伦理学的目标应该是为社会的未来发展、人类的变化及其自然构成奠定道德和伦理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信