Deployment of Liner Systems in Extreme High Mud Weight Environments in Gas Wells

A. H. Oqaili, A. Alluhaydan, P. C. Ezi, A. Tirado
{"title":"Deployment of Liner Systems in Extreme High Mud Weight Environments in Gas Wells","authors":"A. H. Oqaili, A. Alluhaydan, P. C. Ezi, A. Tirado","doi":"10.2118/191594-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the development phase of a gas field, the abnormal pressure in a dolomitic limestone formation demanded an extremely high mud weight to control the well. The casing design of this case-study field has entailed the installation of a 7″ × 9-5/8″ liner hanger in combination with a liner top packer followed by a tieback to surface. Due to this hole section being directly above the pay zone, it is crucial that the liner installation and the wellbore integrity are not compromised for the subsequent well completion.\n The downhole pressure conditions require a drilling mud weight up to 157 pcf (~ 21 ppg), where solids content could reach as high as 49% using conventional weighing materials. For a liner deployment, this means that the high concentration of solids can cause plugging in the setting ports of conventional hydraulic liner hanger and running tool system. Additionally, the thin balance between ECDs and the formation fracture pressures in this field generated events of severe fluid loss during the liner deployment or while cementing. A liner not fully supported by cement — due to severe fluid loss during cementation — can experience ballooning, and be unable to withstand piston forces acting against the liner top packer during well completion operations. These forces can, in some cases, exceed the ratings of the liner top packer's hold-down slips, therefore allowing the packing element of the liner top packer to not set properly.\n For these reasons, an optimized deployment strategy was planned and implemented to address these challenges. It included improvements to the hydraulic liner hanger and running tool system, calculations to simulate an optimal running speed of the liner, enhanced procedures for liner deployment and cementation, including revised setting procedures for the liner hanger slips, and modifications to drill pipe wiper plug design.\n The objective of this paper is to detail the benefits of implementation, detailed pre-job planning, improvements for optimal drilling mud properties and modifications to the liner hanger system, and procedures that resulted in successful deployments of liners in this field. In addition, a case study will be shared as a way to institute lessons learned and best practices.","PeriodicalId":11015,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191594-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the development phase of a gas field, the abnormal pressure in a dolomitic limestone formation demanded an extremely high mud weight to control the well. The casing design of this case-study field has entailed the installation of a 7″ × 9-5/8″ liner hanger in combination with a liner top packer followed by a tieback to surface. Due to this hole section being directly above the pay zone, it is crucial that the liner installation and the wellbore integrity are not compromised for the subsequent well completion. The downhole pressure conditions require a drilling mud weight up to 157 pcf (~ 21 ppg), where solids content could reach as high as 49% using conventional weighing materials. For a liner deployment, this means that the high concentration of solids can cause plugging in the setting ports of conventional hydraulic liner hanger and running tool system. Additionally, the thin balance between ECDs and the formation fracture pressures in this field generated events of severe fluid loss during the liner deployment or while cementing. A liner not fully supported by cement — due to severe fluid loss during cementation — can experience ballooning, and be unable to withstand piston forces acting against the liner top packer during well completion operations. These forces can, in some cases, exceed the ratings of the liner top packer's hold-down slips, therefore allowing the packing element of the liner top packer to not set properly. For these reasons, an optimized deployment strategy was planned and implemented to address these challenges. It included improvements to the hydraulic liner hanger and running tool system, calculations to simulate an optimal running speed of the liner, enhanced procedures for liner deployment and cementation, including revised setting procedures for the liner hanger slips, and modifications to drill pipe wiper plug design. The objective of this paper is to detail the benefits of implementation, detailed pre-job planning, improvements for optimal drilling mud properties and modifications to the liner hanger system, and procedures that resulted in successful deployments of liners in this field. In addition, a case study will be shared as a way to institute lessons learned and best practices.
尾管系统在极端高泥浆比重环境下的应用
在气田开发阶段,白云岩灰岩地层的异常压力需要极高的泥浆密度来控制井。该案例油田的套管设计包括安装一个7″× 9-5/8″尾管悬挂器,与尾管顶部封隔器结合,然后回接到地面。由于该井段位于产层正上方,因此在后续完井作业中,确保尾管安装和井筒完整性不受影响至关重要。井下压力条件下,钻井泥浆的重量要求高达157 pcf (~ 21 ppg),而使用传统称重材料时,固含量可高达49%。对于尾管下入,这意味着高浓度的固体会导致常规液压尾管悬挂器和下入工具系统的坐封口堵塞。此外,在该油田,ecd与地层破裂压力之间的稀薄平衡在尾管下入或固井期间会导致严重的流体漏失。由于固井过程中严重的失液,尾管没有完全得到水泥的支撑,可能会发生膨胀,并且在完井作业中无法承受作用于尾管顶部封隔器的活塞力。在某些情况下,这些作用力可能超过尾管顶部封隔器的压紧卡瓦的额定值,从而导致尾管顶部封隔器的封隔元件无法正确坐封。由于这些原因,我们计划并实施了优化的部署策略来应对这些挑战。其中包括对液压尾管悬挂器和下入工具系统的改进,模拟尾管最佳下入速度的计算,改进尾管下入和固井的程序,包括修改尾管悬挂卡瓦的坐封程序,以及修改钻杆刮水塞的设计。本文的目的是详细介绍实施的好处,详细的作业前规划,优化钻井泥浆性能的改进,尾管悬挂系统的修改,以及在该油田成功部署尾管的程序。此外,将分享一个案例研究,作为建立经验教训和最佳实践的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信