Negative Campaigns between Strategy and Political Opportunism in Romania. Case Study: Ion Iliescu’s Electoral Campaigns in the First Post-Communist Decade

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
M. Mureșan
{"title":"Negative Campaigns between Strategy and Political Opportunism in Romania. Case Study: Ion Iliescu’s Electoral Campaigns in the First Post-Communist Decade","authors":"M. Mureșan","doi":"10.5325/hiperboreea.9.2.0240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In an electoral competition, campaign teams choose strategies that can most easily decide their own candidate’s victory. The present study aims at an incursion into the field of negative campaigns, having two components: the debates of specialists in political science on the subject and the way in which this direction was reflected in the electoral campaigns in Romania during 1990–2000. The article diachronically follows the evolution of Ion Iliescu during the four electoral rounds, highlighting the degree to which the negative campaign was imposed as the main strategy, against whom it was carried out, what topics were promoted, and to what extent it determined the success or failure of the candidate. In the analysis, the first part presents the views of sociologists, historians, and specialists in communication and political science, whereas the case study on the Romanian political environment is based on the written press of the period and the statements of politicians, reflected through the media.","PeriodicalId":40175,"journal":{"name":"Hiperboreea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiperboreea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/hiperboreea.9.2.0240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an electoral competition, campaign teams choose strategies that can most easily decide their own candidate’s victory. The present study aims at an incursion into the field of negative campaigns, having two components: the debates of specialists in political science on the subject and the way in which this direction was reflected in the electoral campaigns in Romania during 1990–2000. The article diachronically follows the evolution of Ion Iliescu during the four electoral rounds, highlighting the degree to which the negative campaign was imposed as the main strategy, against whom it was carried out, what topics were promoted, and to what extent it determined the success or failure of the candidate. In the analysis, the first part presents the views of sociologists, historians, and specialists in communication and political science, whereas the case study on the Romanian political environment is based on the written press of the period and the statements of politicians, reflected through the media.
罗马尼亚战略与政治机会主义之间的负面运动。案例研究:伊里埃斯库在后共产主义时代的第一个十年中的竞选活动
在选举竞争中,竞选团队选择最容易决定自己候选人胜利的策略。本研究的目的是进入消极运动领域,有两个组成部分:政治科学专家对这一问题的辩论以及这一方向在1990-2000年罗马尼亚选举运动中反映出来的方式。这篇文章历时性地跟踪了Ion Iliescu在四轮选举中的演变,强调了负面竞选作为主要战略的程度,针对谁进行的,推广了哪些主题,以及它在多大程度上决定了候选人的成败。在分析中,第一部分呈现了社会学家、历史学家和传播与政治学专家的观点,而对罗马尼亚政治环境的案例研究则基于该时期的书面新闻和政治家的声明,这些言论通过媒体反映出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hiperboreea
Hiperboreea HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信