Evaluating Educational Performance of Postgraduate Students Based on the Tennessee Academic Audit Model

Q3 Medicine
F. Gharibi, A. Imani, Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, K. Dalal
{"title":"Evaluating Educational Performance of Postgraduate Students Based on the Tennessee Academic Audit Model","authors":"F. Gharibi, A. Imani, Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, K. Dalal","doi":"10.5812/semj-132682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The importance of improving quality and performance in higher education has led various universities to turn to effective methods of educational evaluation, such as auditing. Objectives: The present study evaluated the academic performance of the Tabriz Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics postgraduate students, an Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management based on the Tennessee Academic Audit Model. Methods: This descriptive-cross sectional study was conducted in 2019 with the participation of educational managers and faculty members of the same faculties in two phases consisting of self-assessment and external evaluation. After contextualization, the Tennessee comprehensive higher education audit checklist was used. Data were studied descriptively, and the results were reported as frequency (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to evaluate the significance of the difference in academic performance between the educational groups. t-test was also used to evaluate the difference in performance scores in self-assessment and external evaluation phases. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The participants’ performance in the self-assessment phase was moderate (total score: 5.32), and their performance in the external evaluation phase was weak (total score: 2.75). The best and the worst self-assessment scores were in the dimensions of “overall assessment” and “follow-up of previous academic audits,” respectively. In the external evaluation, the dimensions of “contributions to the program and university goals” and “follow-up of previous academic audits” had the best and worst performance scores, respectively. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the Tabriz Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics of the Medical School needs to improve in terms of international standards. Therefore, managers and policymakers are required to implement interventions to address this gap.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-132682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The importance of improving quality and performance in higher education has led various universities to turn to effective methods of educational evaluation, such as auditing. Objectives: The present study evaluated the academic performance of the Tabriz Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics postgraduate students, an Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management based on the Tennessee Academic Audit Model. Methods: This descriptive-cross sectional study was conducted in 2019 with the participation of educational managers and faculty members of the same faculties in two phases consisting of self-assessment and external evaluation. After contextualization, the Tennessee comprehensive higher education audit checklist was used. Data were studied descriptively, and the results were reported as frequency (percentage) and mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to evaluate the significance of the difference in academic performance between the educational groups. t-test was also used to evaluate the difference in performance scores in self-assessment and external evaluation phases. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The participants’ performance in the self-assessment phase was moderate (total score: 5.32), and their performance in the external evaluation phase was weak (total score: 2.75). The best and the worst self-assessment scores were in the dimensions of “overall assessment” and “follow-up of previous academic audits,” respectively. In the external evaluation, the dimensions of “contributions to the program and university goals” and “follow-up of previous academic audits” had the best and worst performance scores, respectively. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the Tabriz Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics of the Medical School needs to improve in terms of international standards. Therefore, managers and policymakers are required to implement interventions to address this gap.
基于田纳西学术审计模型的研究生学业绩效评价
背景:提高高等教育质量和绩效的重要性促使各高校转向审计等有效的教育评估方法。目的:本研究评估了大不里士管理和医学信息学院研究生的学业表现,该学院是伊朗健康管理卓越中心,基于田纳西州学术审计模型。方法:本描述性横断面研究于2019年在同一学院的教育管理人员和教师参与下进行,分为自我评估和外部评估两个阶段。情境化后,采用田纳西州综合高等教育审计清单。对数据进行描述性研究,结果以频率(百分比)和平均值±标准差报告。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验来评估各教育组之间学业成绩差异的显著性。采用t检验对自我评价和外部评价阶段的绩效得分差异进行评价。p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:被试自我评价阶段表现为中等(总分5.32分),外部评价阶段表现为较弱(总分2.75分)。自我评估得分最高的是“整体评估”维度,最差的是“之前的学术审计跟进”维度。在外部评价中,“对项目和大学目标的贡献”维度和“以往学术审计的后续”维度分别表现最好和最差。结论:大不里士医学院管理与医学信息学院的国际水平有待提高。因此,管理人员和政策制定者需要实施干预措施来解决这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信