{"title":"The Wagner Revolt: Implications for Russia, Lessons for the West","authors":"Nigel Gould-Davies","doi":"10.1080/00396338.2023.2239053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Wagner Group’s revolt against Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime, though contained, holds important implications for Russia and lessons for the West. The revolt was a full-scale crisis for the regime, reflected Putin’s extraordinary misreading of domestic realities, undermined his rule’s core rationale of bringing stability and security to Russia, exposed the brittleness of the Russian state, revealed weak support of Russian elites, demonstrated his need for mediation from a despised foreign leader, and brought to the surface the strains that the Russia–Ukraine war has imposed on the Russian polity. The two main takeaways for the West are that Putin chose compromise rather than escalation to deal with the crisis, and that over time the war is likely to impose deeper strains on Russia. It is now less clear than ever not only that Russia can win the war, but also that the regime that launched it will survive intact.","PeriodicalId":51535,"journal":{"name":"Survival","volume":"16 1","pages":"25 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survival","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2239053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The Wagner Group’s revolt against Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime, though contained, holds important implications for Russia and lessons for the West. The revolt was a full-scale crisis for the regime, reflected Putin’s extraordinary misreading of domestic realities, undermined his rule’s core rationale of bringing stability and security to Russia, exposed the brittleness of the Russian state, revealed weak support of Russian elites, demonstrated his need for mediation from a despised foreign leader, and brought to the surface the strains that the Russia–Ukraine war has imposed on the Russian polity. The two main takeaways for the West are that Putin chose compromise rather than escalation to deal with the crisis, and that over time the war is likely to impose deeper strains on Russia. It is now less clear than ever not only that Russia can win the war, but also that the regime that launched it will survive intact.
期刊介绍:
Survival, the Institute"s bi-monthly journal, is a leading forum for analysis and debate of international and strategic affairs. With a diverse range of authors, thoughtful reviews and review essays, Survival is scholarly in depth while vivid, well-written and policy-relevant in approach. Shaped by its editors to be both timely and forward-thinking, the journal encourages writers to challenge conventional wisdom and bring fresh, often controversial, perspectives to bear on the strategic issues of the moment. Survival is essential reading for practitioners, analysts, teachers and followers of international affairs. Each issue also contains Book Reviews of the most important recent publications on international politics and security.