A European perspective on accrediting short learning programs: First experiences are out

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Casadesús, Esther Huertas, Carme Edo
{"title":"A European perspective on accrediting short learning programs: First experiences are out","authors":"M. Casadesús, Esther Huertas, Carme Edo","doi":"10.1177/09504222221132129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In higher education, micro-credentials – that is, proof of the learning results a student has acquired after a short learning programme (SLP) – are gaining in importance. In general, SLPs are formative programs addressed to professionals in a specific area of knowledge. Despite the various characteristics of this type of training, delivered in a wide range of teaching centres and modalities, and therefore the difficulties in defining it, this article presents the first experience of a recognised external quality assurance agency of higher education in accrediting these programs under the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESGs). This is a pioneering experience in Europe, which also has the active and direct participation of universities, the professional sector and government departments (specifically those responsible for university, continuous education and employment policies). From an initial assessment of 33 SLPs, organised by universities and aligned with the demands of the productive sector, different conclusions are drawn. The validity of the proposed evaluation methodology, focused on eight specific dimensions, is emphasised, but there are also difficulties inherent in this type of assessment, such as the qualifications of students who access the programs and the balance between the academic and professional characteristics of the teachers concerned.","PeriodicalId":46591,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Higher Education","volume":"26 1","pages":"433 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221132129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In higher education, micro-credentials – that is, proof of the learning results a student has acquired after a short learning programme (SLP) – are gaining in importance. In general, SLPs are formative programs addressed to professionals in a specific area of knowledge. Despite the various characteristics of this type of training, delivered in a wide range of teaching centres and modalities, and therefore the difficulties in defining it, this article presents the first experience of a recognised external quality assurance agency of higher education in accrediting these programs under the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESGs). This is a pioneering experience in Europe, which also has the active and direct participation of universities, the professional sector and government departments (specifically those responsible for university, continuous education and employment policies). From an initial assessment of 33 SLPs, organised by universities and aligned with the demands of the productive sector, different conclusions are drawn. The validity of the proposed evaluation methodology, focused on eight specific dimensions, is emphasised, but there are also difficulties inherent in this type of assessment, such as the qualifications of students who access the programs and the balance between the academic and professional characteristics of the teachers concerned.
欧洲人对短期学习项目认证的看法:首次体验已过时
在高等教育中,微型证书- -即学生在短期学习计划(SLP)后获得的学习成果的证明- -正变得越来越重要。一般来说,slp是针对特定知识领域的专业人士的形成性课程。尽管这种类型的培训有各种各样的特点,在广泛的教学中心和模式中提供,因此很难定义它,但本文介绍了公认的外部高等教育质量保证机构在欧洲资格框架(EQF)和欧洲高等教育区质量保证标准和指南(ESGs)下对这些课程进行认证的第一次经验。这在欧洲是一个开创性的经验,它也有大学、专业部门和政府部门(特别是负责大学、继续教育和就业政策的部门)的积极和直接参与。根据大学组织的33个slp的初步评估,并与生产部门的需求保持一致,得出了不同的结论。强调了所提出的评估方法的有效性,侧重于八个具体方面,但这种评估也存在固有的困难,例如参加课程的学生的资格以及有关教师的学术和专业特征之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industry and Higher Education
Industry and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Industry and Higher Education focuses on the multifaceted and complex relationships between higher education institutions and business and industry. It looks in detail at the processes and enactments of academia-business cooperation as well as examining the significance of that cooperation in wider contexts, such as regional development, entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems. While emphasizing the practical aspects of academia-business cooperation, IHE also locates practice in theoretical and research contexts, questioning received opinion and developing our understanding of what constitutes truly effective cooperation. Selected key topics Knowledge transfer - processes, mechanisms, successes and failures Research commercialization - from conception to product ''Graduate employability'' - definition, needs and methods Education for entrepreneurship - techniques, measurement and impact The role of the university in economic and social development The third mission and the entrepreneurial university Skills needs and the role of higher education Business-education partnerships for social and economic progress University-industry training and consultancy programmes Innovation networks and their role in furthering university-industry engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信