The IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey: A Tool to Evaluate and Improve Ethical Practices in Health Care

R. Pearlman, M. Bottrell, Jane K Altemose, M. Foglia, E. Fox
{"title":"The IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey: A Tool to Evaluate and Improve Ethical Practices in Health Care","authors":"R. Pearlman, M. Bottrell, Jane K Altemose, M. Foglia, E. Fox","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2012.752416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To improve ethics quality in health care, health care organizations need a way to characterize whether ethical practices throughout the organization are consistent with accepted ethics standards, norms, and expectations for the organization and its staff. We developed the IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS) to fill this need. Methods: The IESS was developed and validated through a rigorous multiyear process. This process included reviews of the bioethics and health care literature to develop conceptual maps of common ethical issues in health care; focus groups and interviews with institutional stakeholders to identify key ethical concerns; cognitive testing, pilot testing, and field testing to ensure that questions were understandable and useful; and item reduction and modification to reduce respondent burden. Results: The IESS addresses staff perceptions of ethical practices in nine domains: everyday workplace, business and management, government service, patient privacy and confidentiality, resource allocation, shared decision making with patients, professionalism in patient care, end-of-life care, and research. The 2010 version of the survey consisted of 76 questions (excluding 8 demographic questions), including questions about the degree to which facility staff demonstrate behavior consistent with specific ethical practices, systems-level or organizational factors that support or interfere with ethical practices, and the ethical environment and culture. The IESS has served as a catalyst for multiple quality improvement and educational activities. Conclusions: The IESS represents an across-the-board approach to measuring ethics quality in multiple areas encompassing clinical, organizational, and research ethics. In addition to its use in quality improvement efforts, the IESS may be used to assess whether there are systematic differences across different disciplines, services, and supervisory levels; to evaluate the effectiveness of ethics programs; and to identify trends in ethical practices over time.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"41 1","pages":"19 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.752416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: To improve ethics quality in health care, health care organizations need a way to characterize whether ethical practices throughout the organization are consistent with accepted ethics standards, norms, and expectations for the organization and its staff. We developed the IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS) to fill this need. Methods: The IESS was developed and validated through a rigorous multiyear process. This process included reviews of the bioethics and health care literature to develop conceptual maps of common ethical issues in health care; focus groups and interviews with institutional stakeholders to identify key ethical concerns; cognitive testing, pilot testing, and field testing to ensure that questions were understandable and useful; and item reduction and modification to reduce respondent burden. Results: The IESS addresses staff perceptions of ethical practices in nine domains: everyday workplace, business and management, government service, patient privacy and confidentiality, resource allocation, shared decision making with patients, professionalism in patient care, end-of-life care, and research. The 2010 version of the survey consisted of 76 questions (excluding 8 demographic questions), including questions about the degree to which facility staff demonstrate behavior consistent with specific ethical practices, systems-level or organizational factors that support or interfere with ethical practices, and the ethical environment and culture. The IESS has served as a catalyst for multiple quality improvement and educational activities. Conclusions: The IESS represents an across-the-board approach to measuring ethics quality in multiple areas encompassing clinical, organizational, and research ethics. In addition to its use in quality improvement efforts, the IESS may be used to assess whether there are systematic differences across different disciplines, services, and supervisory levels; to evaluate the effectiveness of ethics programs; and to identify trends in ethical practices over time.
综合伦理学员工调查:评估和改进卫生保健伦理实践的工具
背景:为了提高卫生保健的道德质量,卫生保健组织需要一种方法来描述整个组织的道德实践是否符合公认的道德标准、规范和对组织及其员工的期望。我们开发了integrateethics™员工调查(IESS)来满足这一需求。方法:通过多年严格的过程开发和验证IESS。这一过程包括对生物伦理学和卫生保健文献的审查,以制定卫生保健中常见伦理问题的概念图;与机构利益相关者进行焦点小组和访谈,以确定关键的道德问题;认知测试,试点测试和现场测试,以确保问题是可理解的和有用的;减少和修改项目,减少被调查者的负担。结果:IESS涉及员工对九个领域道德实践的看法:日常工作场所、商业和管理、政府服务、患者隐私和保密、资源分配、与患者共同决策、患者护理的专业性、临终关怀和研究。2010年版本的调查包括76个问题(不包括8个人口统计问题),包括有关设施员工表现出符合特定道德实践的行为的程度、支持或干扰道德实践的系统级或组织因素、道德环境和文化的问题。IESS已成为多种质量改进和教育活动的催化剂。结论:IESS代表了一种全面的方法来衡量包括临床、组织和研究伦理在内的多个领域的伦理质量。除了在质素改善工作中使用外,资讯质素评估亦可用于评估不同学科、服务和监管级别之间是否存在系统差异;评估道德项目的有效性;并确定道德实践的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信