VAISHNAVISM, ANTIEVOLUTIONISM, AND AMBIGUITIES: REVISITING ISKCON'S DARWIN‐SKEPTICISM

IF 0.6 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Zygon Pub Date : 2018-02-12 DOI:10.1111/ZYGO.12395
Oliver Zambon, Thomas Aechtner
{"title":"VAISHNAVISM, ANTIEVOLUTIONISM, AND AMBIGUITIES: REVISITING ISKCON'S DARWIN‐SKEPTICISM","authors":"Oliver Zambon, Thomas Aechtner","doi":"10.1111/ZYGO.12395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Society of Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), commonly known as the Hare Krishna Movement, has disseminated a flurry of antievolutionist media since its inception in 1966. Such communications frequently co-opt arguments employed by Christian creationists and Intelligent Design theorists. At the same time, however, there are indications that a scattering of ISKCON publications have articulated relatively ambiguous, less oppositional statements about evolutionary theory. This article reconsiders ISKCON's Darwin-skepticism by appraising recent, largely unexamined Hare Krishna publications, as well as responses to evolutionary theory expressed by ISKCON's founder, A. C. Bhaktivedanta, and his immediate Vaishnava forerunners. The analysis reveals that, although the majority of contemporary ISKCON materials are vehemently opposed to evolution, some leading voices demonstrate less combative, cautiously accommodating stances. These cases are suggestive of complexities in ISKCON's responses to evolution, both past and present, which are not necessarily encapsulated in the terms Vedic creationism or antievolutionism.","PeriodicalId":46315,"journal":{"name":"Zygon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zygon","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ZYGO.12395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The International Society of Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), commonly known as the Hare Krishna Movement, has disseminated a flurry of antievolutionist media since its inception in 1966. Such communications frequently co-opt arguments employed by Christian creationists and Intelligent Design theorists. At the same time, however, there are indications that a scattering of ISKCON publications have articulated relatively ambiguous, less oppositional statements about evolutionary theory. This article reconsiders ISKCON's Darwin-skepticism by appraising recent, largely unexamined Hare Krishna publications, as well as responses to evolutionary theory expressed by ISKCON's founder, A. C. Bhaktivedanta, and his immediate Vaishnava forerunners. The analysis reveals that, although the majority of contemporary ISKCON materials are vehemently opposed to evolution, some leading voices demonstrate less combative, cautiously accommodating stances. These cases are suggestive of complexities in ISKCON's responses to evolution, both past and present, which are not necessarily encapsulated in the terms Vedic creationism or antievolutionism.
毗湿奴主义,反进化论,和模棱两可:重新审视iskcon的达尔文怀疑论
国际奎师那知觉协会(ISKCON),通常被称为哈瑞奎师那运动,自1966年成立以来,已经传播了一系列反进化论媒体。这样的交流经常采用基督教神创论者和智能设计论者所采用的论点。然而,与此同时,有迹象表明,ISKCON出版物的分散表达了相对模糊的、较少反对的关于进化论的陈述。这篇文章通过评价最近大部分未经检验的哈瑞·克里希纳的出版物,以及对ISKCON的创始人a·c·巴克提吠檀多及其毗湿奴派先行者所表达的进化论的回应,重新审视了ISKCON的达尔文怀疑论。分析表明,尽管大多数当代ISKCON材料都强烈反对进化论,但一些主要的声音表现出不那么好斗,谨慎适应的立场。这些案例暗示了ISKCON对进化的反应的复杂性,无论是过去还是现在,都不一定包含在吠陀创造论或反进化论的术语中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zygon
Zygon Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Zygon focuses on the questions of meaning and values that challenge individual and social existence today. It brings together the best thinking of the day from the physical, biological, and social sciences with ideas from philosophy, theology, and religious studies. The journal"s contributors seek to keep united what may often become disconnected: values with knowledge, goodness with truth, religion with science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信