Cord blood nRBC distributions in a low-risk population: can they identify the time of fetal injury?

Marino Poliseno DO , Laura Tyree MD , Elina Burstyn DO , Teresita Mauricio MS , Kathryn McHale , CM Salafia MD, MS
{"title":"Cord blood nRBC distributions in a low-risk population: can they identify the time of fetal injury?","authors":"Marino Poliseno DO ,&nbsp;Laura Tyree MD ,&nbsp;Elina Burstyn DO ,&nbsp;Teresita Mauricio MS ,&nbsp;Kathryn McHale ,&nbsp;CM Salafia MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/S1068-607X(03)00071-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hypothesis of this study is that nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) released in response to low [O<sub>2</sub><span><span>] are correlated with components of such a response (e.g., reticulocytes<span><span> and increased erythrocyte number), and that such a response is correlated with abnormal placental growth, pathology, and reduced </span>fetal growth<span>. 166 term births had complete blood counts<span> (CBC) and differentials performed on cord blood. Of these, 139 had placental examination blinded to hematologic data. Total nRBC count was calculated from nRBC count/100 white blood cells (WBC) and corrected WBC count<span>. Nonparametric (Spearman's) correlations assessed associations with hematocrit and total RBC, reticulocyte, and neutrophil counts and with placental parameters. Logtransformed nRBC counts served in multivariate regression. Our results were that nRBCs and reticulocytes were correlated (p = 0.03, r = 0.21). nRBC and reticulocytes did not correlate with hematocrit. After adjustment for reticulocyte count, nRBCs were correlated with band neutrophils (p = 0.02, r = 0.30). Reticulocytes correlated with neither myeloid count. nRBC count was related to birthweight (r = 0.21) and placental weight<span> (r = 0.20), but not to other placental measures. Reticulocyte count was related to placental volume (r = 0.20, p = 0.02) and fetal/placental weight ratio (r = −0.31, p = 0.007). No placental pathology was related to fetal hematology. A predictive equation including birthweight and placental weight showed p = 0.05, although each individual p was &gt;0.4. In conclusion, our data suggest that elevated nRBC and </span></span></span></span></span></span>reticulocyte counts identify clinically well term fetuses with compensatory responses to altered [O</span><sub>2</sub><span>]. A portion of nRBC variance is independent of reticulocyte count, and attributable to change in band neutrophil count. In well term newborns, nRBC count is related to birthweight and placental weight, but this relationship is likely complex and non-linear.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":80301,"journal":{"name":"Primary care update for Ob/Gyns","volume":"10 6","pages":"Pages 292-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1068-607X(03)00071-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care update for Ob/Gyns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068607X03000714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hypothesis of this study is that nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) released in response to low [O2] are correlated with components of such a response (e.g., reticulocytes and increased erythrocyte number), and that such a response is correlated with abnormal placental growth, pathology, and reduced fetal growth. 166 term births had complete blood counts (CBC) and differentials performed on cord blood. Of these, 139 had placental examination blinded to hematologic data. Total nRBC count was calculated from nRBC count/100 white blood cells (WBC) and corrected WBC count. Nonparametric (Spearman's) correlations assessed associations with hematocrit and total RBC, reticulocyte, and neutrophil counts and with placental parameters. Logtransformed nRBC counts served in multivariate regression. Our results were that nRBCs and reticulocytes were correlated (p = 0.03, r = 0.21). nRBC and reticulocytes did not correlate with hematocrit. After adjustment for reticulocyte count, nRBCs were correlated with band neutrophils (p = 0.02, r = 0.30). Reticulocytes correlated with neither myeloid count. nRBC count was related to birthweight (r = 0.21) and placental weight (r = 0.20), but not to other placental measures. Reticulocyte count was related to placental volume (r = 0.20, p = 0.02) and fetal/placental weight ratio (r = −0.31, p = 0.007). No placental pathology was related to fetal hematology. A predictive equation including birthweight and placental weight showed p = 0.05, although each individual p was >0.4. In conclusion, our data suggest that elevated nRBC and reticulocyte counts identify clinically well term fetuses with compensatory responses to altered [O2]. A portion of nRBC variance is independent of reticulocyte count, and attributable to change in band neutrophil count. In well term newborns, nRBC count is related to birthweight and placental weight, but this relationship is likely complex and non-linear.

低风险人群的脐带血nRBC分布:它们能识别胎儿损伤的时间吗?
本研究的假设是低[O2]时释放的有核红细胞(nRBCs)与该反应的组成部分(如网织红细胞和红细胞数量增加)相关,且该反应与胎盘异常生长、病理和胎儿生长减少有关。166个足月新生儿有全血细胞计数(CBC)和脐带血鉴别。其中139例在不了解血液学资料的情况下进行了胎盘检查。总nRBC计数由nRBC计数/100白细胞(WBC)和校正后的WBC计数计算。非参数相关性(Spearman’s)评估与红细胞压积、总红细胞、网织红细胞和中性粒细胞计数以及胎盘参数的相关性。对数转换的nRBC计数用于多元回归。我们的结果是nrbc和网织红细胞相关(p = 0.03, r = 0.21)。nRBC和网织红细胞与红细胞压积无关。调整网织红细胞计数后,nrbc与带状中性粒细胞相关(p = 0.02, r = 0.30)。网织红细胞与骨髓计数无关。nRBC计数与出生体重(r = 0.21)和胎盘重量(r = 0.20)相关,但与其他胎盘指标无关。网织红细胞计数与胎盘体积(r = 0.20, p = 0.02)和胎重比(r = - 0.31, p = 0.007)相关。胎盘病理与胎儿血液学无相关性。包括出生体重和胎盘重量的预测方程显示p = 0.05,尽管每个个体p为>0.4。总之,我们的数据表明,nRBC和网织红细胞计数升高可以识别临床足月胎儿对改变的代偿反应[O2]。部分nRBC变异与网织红细胞计数无关,可归因于带中性粒细胞计数的变化。在足月新生儿中,nRBC计数与出生体重和胎盘重量有关,但这种关系可能是复杂和非线性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信