Prevalence of Malocclusion Patterns in Mouth Breathing Children Compared to Nasal Breathing Children – A Systematic Review

M. Greven
{"title":"Prevalence of Malocclusion Patterns in Mouth Breathing Children Compared to Nasal Breathing Children – A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Greven","doi":"10.11648/J.IJCOMS.20210702.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of malocclusion in mouth breathing children compared to nasal breathing children is unclear, therefore the aim of this study is to identify this prevalence in a systematic review. Seven studies were included. Six studies investigated the prevalence of malocclusion in mouth breathers and compared them with the prevalence data in nose breathers. One study evaluated the prevalence of mouth- and nose breathing in children with malocclusion. The prevalence rates for class I to class III malocclusions vary significantly between studies. For class I malocclusions, a prevalence between 9% and 74% was identified in the included studies. For class II malocclusions a prevalence between 21% and 73% was shown, which equalled roughly the prevalence of class I malocclusions. Class III malocclusions were the least prevalent, between 5% and 24%. There is insufficient evidence for a difference in prevalence patterns of class I – III malocclusions between mouth and nasal breathers in order to draw a definite conclusion. The quality of the included studies was rated moderate to poor. Research on the prevalence of malocclusions in mouth breathing compared to nasal breathing children is scarce. Identified prevalence rates differ significantly, which is likely due to different assessment and reporting methods used in the included studies. The evidence of a difference in prevalence patterns for class I – III malocclusions and other occlusion traits between mouth and nasal breathers is insufficient to draw a definite conclusion.","PeriodicalId":92911,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJCOMS.20210702.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of malocclusion in mouth breathing children compared to nasal breathing children is unclear, therefore the aim of this study is to identify this prevalence in a systematic review. Seven studies were included. Six studies investigated the prevalence of malocclusion in mouth breathers and compared them with the prevalence data in nose breathers. One study evaluated the prevalence of mouth- and nose breathing in children with malocclusion. The prevalence rates for class I to class III malocclusions vary significantly between studies. For class I malocclusions, a prevalence between 9% and 74% was identified in the included studies. For class II malocclusions a prevalence between 21% and 73% was shown, which equalled roughly the prevalence of class I malocclusions. Class III malocclusions were the least prevalent, between 5% and 24%. There is insufficient evidence for a difference in prevalence patterns of class I – III malocclusions between mouth and nasal breathers in order to draw a definite conclusion. The quality of the included studies was rated moderate to poor. Research on the prevalence of malocclusions in mouth breathing compared to nasal breathing children is scarce. Identified prevalence rates differ significantly, which is likely due to different assessment and reporting methods used in the included studies. The evidence of a difference in prevalence patterns for class I – III malocclusions and other occlusion traits between mouth and nasal breathers is insufficient to draw a definite conclusion.
与鼻呼吸儿童相比,口呼吸儿童错牙合模式的患病率-一项系统综述
与鼻呼吸儿童相比,口呼吸儿童错牙合的患病率尚不清楚,因此本研究的目的是通过系统回顾来确定这种患病率。纳入了7项研究。六项研究调查了口腔呼吸者的错牙合患病率,并将其与鼻腔呼吸者的患病率数据进行了比较。一项研究评估了错颌儿童口鼻呼吸的患病率。在不同的研究中,I类和III类错牙合的患病率差异很大。在纳入的研究中,I类错颌的患病率在9%至74%之间。II类错颌的患病率在21%到73%之间,这与I类错颌的患病率大致相当。III类错咬合发生率最低,在5% - 24%之间。没有足够的证据表明口腔呼吸者和鼻腔呼吸者之间I - III类错咬合的流行模式存在差异,因此无法得出明确的结论。纳入研究的质量评定为中等到较差。与鼻呼吸患儿相比,对口腔呼吸畸形患病率的研究较少。确定的患病率差异很大,这可能是由于纳入的研究中使用了不同的评估和报告方法。口腔呼吸者和鼻腔呼吸者在I - III类错咬合和其他咬合特征的患病率模式上存在差异的证据不足以得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信