Tracheostomy for weaning prolonged mechanical ventilation in adult post cardiac surgical patients

Aly Makram Habib , Makhlouf Belghith
{"title":"Tracheostomy for weaning prolonged mechanical ventilation in adult post cardiac surgical patients","authors":"Aly Makram Habib ,&nbsp;Makhlouf Belghith","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This is a retrospective observational study to show the role of tracheostomy in liberation of mechanical ventilation in adult post cardiac surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between January 2009 and December 2013, all post cardiac surgical patients who were ventilated for ≥7 days were allocated into: group (T) who had tracheostomy or group (PI) who did not have tracheostomy. Both groups were compared for ventilator free days at 30 (VFD-30) and 60 days (VFD-60) post Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) admission, Length of Stay (LOS), and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VFD-30 and VFD-60 were statistically significant higher in (PI) group compared to (T) group (7.5 ± 9.2 vs.0.9 ± 3.3, P = 0.000) and (22.3 ± 23.8 vs. 6.7 ± 13.3, P = 0.007) respectively. Comparing VFD at 30 and 60 days post tracheostomy (VFD-30T and VFD-60T) in (T) group to VFD at 30 and 60 days after admission in (PI) group, no difference was found (6.9 ± 8.9 vs. 7.5 ± 9.2, P = 0.8) and (29 ± 22.6 vs. 22.3 ± 23.8, P = 0.5) respectively. CSICU LOS was statistically significant higher in the (T) group compared to the (PI) group (71.6 ± 61.2 vs. 30.3 ± 35.6, P = 0.04). The hospital LOS and CSICU mortality, were not different between the 2 groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Tracheostomy for post cardiac surgery patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation did not improve VFD or CSICU LOS in our institute.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 100-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.03.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X18300051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This is a retrospective observational study to show the role of tracheostomy in liberation of mechanical ventilation in adult post cardiac surgery.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2013, all post cardiac surgical patients who were ventilated for ≥7 days were allocated into: group (T) who had tracheostomy or group (PI) who did not have tracheostomy. Both groups were compared for ventilator free days at 30 (VFD-30) and 60 days (VFD-60) post Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) admission, Length of Stay (LOS), and mortality.

Results

VFD-30 and VFD-60 were statistically significant higher in (PI) group compared to (T) group (7.5 ± 9.2 vs.0.9 ± 3.3, P = 0.000) and (22.3 ± 23.8 vs. 6.7 ± 13.3, P = 0.007) respectively. Comparing VFD at 30 and 60 days post tracheostomy (VFD-30T and VFD-60T) in (T) group to VFD at 30 and 60 days after admission in (PI) group, no difference was found (6.9 ± 8.9 vs. 7.5 ± 9.2, P = 0.8) and (29 ± 22.6 vs. 22.3 ± 23.8, P = 0.5) respectively. CSICU LOS was statistically significant higher in the (T) group compared to the (PI) group (71.6 ± 61.2 vs. 30.3 ± 35.6, P = 0.04). The hospital LOS and CSICU mortality, were not different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Tracheostomy for post cardiac surgery patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation did not improve VFD or CSICU LOS in our institute.

气管切开术在成人心脏手术后患者脱机延长机械通气中的应用
这是一项回顾性观察性研究,旨在显示气管切开术在成人心脏手术后机械通气解放中的作用。方法2009年1月~ 2013年12月,所有心脏手术后通气≥7天的患者分为:气管切开术组(T)和未气管切开术组(PI)。比较两组心脏外科重症监护病房(CSICU)入院后30天(VFD-30)和60天(VFD-60)无呼吸机天数、住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。ResultsVFD-30和VFD-60显著较高(PI)组相比(T)组(7.5 ±9.2 vs.0.9 ± 3.3,P = 0.000)和(22.3 ±23.8 vs 6.7  ± 13.3,P = 0.007)。比较节能30和60天邮报气管造口术(VFD-30T和VFD-60T) (T)组在30和60天后VFD入学(PI)组中,没有发现差异(6.9 ±8.9 vs 7.5  ± 9.2,P = 0.8)和(29 ± 22.6 vs 22.3 ± 23.8,P = 0.5)。(T)组CSICU LOS明显高于(PI)组(71.6 ± 61.2 vs. 30.3 ± 35.6,P = 0.04)。两组间医院LOS和CSICU死亡率无显著差异。结论我院心脏术后长时间机械通气患者行胸腔造口术并不能改善VFD和CSICU LOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信