Novel rules for extracting the entities of entity relationship models

M. Omar, Abdulrhman Alsheky, Balha Faiz
{"title":"Novel rules for extracting the entities of entity relationship models","authors":"M. Omar, Abdulrhman Alsheky, Balha Faiz","doi":"10.51984/jopas.v20i2.1329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extracting entities from natural language text to design conceptual models of the entity relationships is not trivial and novice designers and students can find it especially difficult. Researchers have suggested linguistic rules/guidelines for extracting entities from natural language text. Unfortunately, while these guidelines are often correct they can, also, be invalid. There is no rule that is true at all times. This paper suggests novel rules based on the machine learning classifiers, the RIPPER, the PART and the decision trees. Performance comparison was made between the linguistic and the machine learning rules. The results shows that there was a dramatic improvement when machine learning rules were used.","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v20i2.1329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracting entities from natural language text to design conceptual models of the entity relationships is not trivial and novice designers and students can find it especially difficult. Researchers have suggested linguistic rules/guidelines for extracting entities from natural language text. Unfortunately, while these guidelines are often correct they can, also, be invalid. There is no rule that is true at all times. This paper suggests novel rules based on the machine learning classifiers, the RIPPER, the PART and the decision trees. Performance comparison was made between the linguistic and the machine learning rules. The results shows that there was a dramatic improvement when machine learning rules were used.
实体关系模型中实体提取的新规则
从自然语言文本中提取实体来设计实体关系的概念模型并非易事,新手设计师和学生可能会发现这尤其困难。研究人员提出了从自然语言文本中提取实体的语言规则/准则。不幸的是,虽然这些指导方针通常是正确的,但也可能是无效的。没有永远适用的规则。本文提出了基于机器学习分类器、RIPPER、PART和决策树的新规则。对语言规则和机器学习规则进行了性能比较。结果表明,当使用机器学习规则时,有一个显着的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信