Public Management’s Problems are Legal Problems: How Law Contributes to Inequity in Contemporary Governance

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Ben Merriman
{"title":"Public Management’s Problems are Legal Problems: How Law Contributes to Inequity in Contemporary Governance","authors":"Ben Merriman","doi":"10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the latter half of the twentieth century, legal changes obliged public organizations in the United States to alter and standardize their procedures to provide due process and promote equal protection. Integration of administration into the constitutional order produced two remarkable changes. First, the everyday work of administration uses forms and vocabularies resembling those of law and the court system. Second, adoption of legally mandated due process protections catalyzed a broader values reorientation, yielding practices that promote social equity and public participation. However, as administrative practice became more law-like, partisans and organized interests made new use of legal tactics to bend administrative decision-making toward their own ends. Common patterns of unequal outcomes in the American legal system thus arise, in similar forms, in administrative settings. Law’s problems have thereby become governance problems. This article elucidates these past and current patterns by reading law and society literature alongside that of public administration and public management. In doing so, it shows that these two fields have long developed in parallel and have much to contribute to each other. This article underscores the importance of mutual learning and understanding between the fields of law and society and public administration and management.","PeriodicalId":29947,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the latter half of the twentieth century, legal changes obliged public organizations in the United States to alter and standardize their procedures to provide due process and promote equal protection. Integration of administration into the constitutional order produced two remarkable changes. First, the everyday work of administration uses forms and vocabularies resembling those of law and the court system. Second, adoption of legally mandated due process protections catalyzed a broader values reorientation, yielding practices that promote social equity and public participation. However, as administrative practice became more law-like, partisans and organized interests made new use of legal tactics to bend administrative decision-making toward their own ends. Common patterns of unequal outcomes in the American legal system thus arise, in similar forms, in administrative settings. Law’s problems have thereby become governance problems. This article elucidates these past and current patterns by reading law and society literature alongside that of public administration and public management. In doing so, it shows that these two fields have long developed in parallel and have much to contribute to each other. This article underscores the importance of mutual learning and understanding between the fields of law and society and public administration and management.
公共管理的问题是法律问题:法律如何导致当代治理中的不公平
在20世纪后半叶,法律的变化迫使美国的公共组织改变和规范其程序,以提供正当程序和促进平等保护。行政与宪法秩序的融合产生了两个显著的变化。首先,日常行政工作使用的形式和词汇与法律和法院系统的形式和词汇相似。其次,采用法律规定的正当程序保护促进了更广泛的价值观重新定位,产生了促进社会公平和公众参与的做法。然而,随着行政实践变得更加法制化,党派和有组织的利益集团利用新的法律策略来扭曲行政决策以达到自己的目的。因此,美国法律体系中不平等结果的常见模式以类似的形式出现在行政环境中。法律的问题因此变成了治理的问题。本文通过阅读法律和社会文献以及公共行政和公共管理文献来阐明这些过去和现在的模式。在这样做的过程中,它表明这两个领域长期以来是并行发展的,并且彼此有很多贡献。这篇文章强调了法律和社会领域以及公共行政和管理领域之间相互学习和理解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信