Development of scenarios for leadership psychology research to reveal the relationships between leaders’ Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles

Tadas Vadvilavičius, A. Stelmokienė
{"title":"Development of scenarios for leadership psychology research to reveal the relationships between leaders’ Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles","authors":"Tadas Vadvilavičius, A. Stelmokienė","doi":"10.7220/2345-024x.23.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The Full Range Leadership Model (Avolio, Bass, 2004) is one of the most popular leadership theories, while the Dark Triad (Paulhus, Williams, 2002) has become the most researched personality model that describes the “dark side” of personality. However, despite the popularity, there is still a lack of evidence about relationship between Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles. Besides, researchers confirm the need for reliable and valid instruments that could be used in such empirical studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of scenarios that were developed and used to reveal the relationships between leaders’ Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles in the perception of potential employees. Methods. 40 students from psychology Bachelor’s and Master’s programs participated in this research (90% females, mean age – 24.90 (SD=5.52)). Five scenarios were developed to represent hypothetical leaders with different patterns of Dark Triad traits expression and were used as stimuli material for this quasiexperiment. Participants were asked to read one out of five scenarios and to fill in two questionnaires about the hypothetical leader: the Dirty Dozen scale (Jonason & Webster, 2010) to assess Dark Triad traits, and the Multifactorial Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 2004) to assess leadership styles and outcomes from Full-range leadership model. Data were collected via online survey. Results. All developed scenarios showed high reliability. However, results confirmed construct validity in only of four out of five scenarios. Relationships between Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles, and Dark Triad traits and leadership outcomes, were not significant. Conclusions. Developed Dark Triad leader scenarios could be an original and useful instrument for leadership psychology research. Some revisions should be made before the future usage of them.","PeriodicalId":31986,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology A Biopsychosocial Approach","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology A Biopsychosocial Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024x.23.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The Full Range Leadership Model (Avolio, Bass, 2004) is one of the most popular leadership theories, while the Dark Triad (Paulhus, Williams, 2002) has become the most researched personality model that describes the “dark side” of personality. However, despite the popularity, there is still a lack of evidence about relationship between Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles. Besides, researchers confirm the need for reliable and valid instruments that could be used in such empirical studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of scenarios that were developed and used to reveal the relationships between leaders’ Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles in the perception of potential employees. Methods. 40 students from psychology Bachelor’s and Master’s programs participated in this research (90% females, mean age – 24.90 (SD=5.52)). Five scenarios were developed to represent hypothetical leaders with different patterns of Dark Triad traits expression and were used as stimuli material for this quasiexperiment. Participants were asked to read one out of five scenarios and to fill in two questionnaires about the hypothetical leader: the Dirty Dozen scale (Jonason & Webster, 2010) to assess Dark Triad traits, and the Multifactorial Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 2004) to assess leadership styles and outcomes from Full-range leadership model. Data were collected via online survey. Results. All developed scenarios showed high reliability. However, results confirmed construct validity in only of four out of five scenarios. Relationships between Dark Triad traits and Full Range Leadership styles, and Dark Triad traits and leadership outcomes, were not significant. Conclusions. Developed Dark Triad leader scenarios could be an original and useful instrument for leadership psychology research. Some revisions should be made before the future usage of them.
开发领导心理学研究情境,揭示领导者黑暗人格特质与全方位领导风格之间的关系
目标。全方位领导模型(Avolio, Bass, 2004)是最流行的领导理论之一,而黑暗三合一(Paulhus, Williams, 2002)已经成为研究最多的人格模型,它描述了人格的“阴暗面”。然而,尽管受欢迎,仍然缺乏证据表明黑暗三合一特征和全方位领导风格之间的关系。此外,研究人员确认需要可靠和有效的工具,可以用于这种实证研究。因此,本研究的目的是评估所开发的情景的效度和信度,这些情景被用来揭示领导者的黑暗三合一特征与潜在员工感知中的全方位领导风格之间的关系。方法:40名心理学本科和硕士研究生参与了本研究,其中90%为女性,平均年龄- 24.90岁(SD=5.52)。设计了五种情景来代表具有不同黑暗三合一特征表达模式的假想领导者,并将其作为拟实验的刺激材料。参与者被要求阅读五种场景中的一种,并填写两份关于假设领导者的问卷:一份是评估黑暗三合一特征的Dirty Dozen量表(jonason&webster, 2010),另一份是评估领导风格和全方位领导模型结果的多因素领导问卷(avoolio & Bass, 2004)。数据通过在线调查收集。结果。所有开发的场景都显示出高可靠性。然而,结果证实结构效度只有四分之五的情景。黑暗人格特质与全方位领导风格、黑暗人格特质与领导结果的关系不显著。结论。开发出的黑暗三位一体领导情景可以成为领导心理学研究的一种新颖而有用的工具。在将来使用它们之前,应该做一些修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信