A multiparametric MRI score for prostate cancer detection: Performance in patients with and without endorectal coil

R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, S. Setola, V. Granata, N. Raiano, P. Delprete, G. Quarto, Aless, ro Izzo Sisto Perdona
{"title":"A multiparametric MRI score for prostate cancer detection: Performance in patients with and without endorectal coil","authors":"R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, S. Setola, V. Granata, N. Raiano, P. Delprete, G. Quarto, Aless, ro Izzo Sisto Perdona","doi":"10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer in two different coil setting: endorectal coil (ERC) versus phased array coil alone (PAC). Materials and Methods: The study included 302 out of 395 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5-4 ng/ml and an abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4-10ng/ml, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, morphological MRI (mMRI), DWI, MRS, and Trans Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI data sets were scored singularly and then mMRI, DWI and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). cMRI score was correlated to negative biopsies and Gleason score biopsies. ROC curve and McNemar tests were performed. Results: cMRI score showed high value of sensitivity and NPV for both coil setting (84% and 93% respectively using ERC, 87% and 87% respectively using PAC). cMRI score using ERC did not show statistical superiority compared with cMRI score using PAC alone (p value at McNemar test > 0.05). A significant correlation was obtained comparing the cMRI score to the Gleason score for both coil conditions. Conclusions: Pelvic phased array coil imaging of the prostate produces high quality images and the overall performance in prostate cancer detection is equal than those obtained with endorectal coil imaging.","PeriodicalId":13333,"journal":{"name":"Imaging in Medicine","volume":"86 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer in two different coil setting: endorectal coil (ERC) versus phased array coil alone (PAC). Materials and Methods: The study included 302 out of 395 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5-4 ng/ml and an abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4-10ng/ml, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, morphological MRI (mMRI), DWI, MRS, and Trans Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI data sets were scored singularly and then mMRI, DWI and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). cMRI score was correlated to negative biopsies and Gleason score biopsies. ROC curve and McNemar tests were performed. Results: cMRI score showed high value of sensitivity and NPV for both coil setting (84% and 93% respectively using ERC, 87% and 87% respectively using PAC). cMRI score using ERC did not show statistical superiority compared with cMRI score using PAC alone (p value at McNemar test > 0.05). A significant correlation was obtained comparing the cMRI score to the Gleason score for both coil conditions. Conclusions: Pelvic phased array coil imaging of the prostate produces high quality images and the overall performance in prostate cancer detection is equal than those obtained with endorectal coil imaging.
前列腺癌检测的多参数MRI评分:有无直肠内线圈患者的表现
目的:评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在两种不同线圈设置下检测前列腺癌的诊断性能:直肠内线圈(ERC)与单独相控阵线圈(PAC)。材料和方法:该研究纳入了395例PSA值在2.5-4 ng/ml之间且直肠指检(DRE)异常的患者中的302例,或PSA值在4-10ng/ml之间且独立于DRE的患者。每位患者均提供知情同意,接受血清游离/总PSA比(f/t PSA)测定、形态MRI (mMRI)、DWI、MRS和经直肠超声检查(TRUS)活检。MRI数据集单独评分,然后将mMRI、DWI和MRS数据合并为一个评分(cMRI评分)。cMRI评分与阴性活检和Gleason评分相关。进行ROC曲线和McNemar检验。结果:cMRI评分对两种线圈设置的敏感性和NPV值均较高(ERC分别为84%和93%,PAC分别为87%和87%)。使用ERC的cMRI评分与单独使用PAC的cMRI评分相比没有统计学上的优势(McNemar检验的p值为0.05)。在两种线圈条件下,比较cMRI评分与Gleason评分获得了显著的相关性。结论:盆腔相控阵线圈摄护腺成像成像质量高,在前列腺癌检测中的总体表现与直肠内线圈摄护腺成像相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信