{"title":"Author Meets Critics: Paul Thompson, The Spirit of the Soil, 2nd Ed","authors":"C. Wolf, A. Thompson, Evelyn Brister, P. Thompson","doi":"10.1080/21550085.2021.1904528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul Thompson’s Spirit of the Soil was groundbreaking when it appeared in 1995, and has aged remarkably well. The substantially revised new edition is a benefit not only for the field of agriculture and ethics, but also because it provides a new window into the changing ideas of Thompson himself. This is significant because Thompson’s work on this topic has shaped the field so decisively that his views are sometimes recited as common knowledge. As a result of this book and its notoriety, Thompson may have suffered the worst-best fate that can befall a philosopher: Language from this book, and aspects of Thompson’s framework for thinking about central issues in agriculture, have become so standard in the field of sustainable agriculture that people no longer remember where the terms and ideas came from. I sometimes find students reciting as common knowledge what used to be regarded as philosophically interesting claims first made by Paul Thompson. For example, a paper published this month by a former student of mine in the journal Global Environmental Change includes the following:","PeriodicalId":45955,"journal":{"name":"Ethics Policy & Environment","volume":"14 1","pages":"194 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics Policy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1904528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paul Thompson’s Spirit of the Soil was groundbreaking when it appeared in 1995, and has aged remarkably well. The substantially revised new edition is a benefit not only for the field of agriculture and ethics, but also because it provides a new window into the changing ideas of Thompson himself. This is significant because Thompson’s work on this topic has shaped the field so decisively that his views are sometimes recited as common knowledge. As a result of this book and its notoriety, Thompson may have suffered the worst-best fate that can befall a philosopher: Language from this book, and aspects of Thompson’s framework for thinking about central issues in agriculture, have become so standard in the field of sustainable agriculture that people no longer remember where the terms and ideas came from. I sometimes find students reciting as common knowledge what used to be regarded as philosophically interesting claims first made by Paul Thompson. For example, a paper published this month by a former student of mine in the journal Global Environmental Change includes the following:
保罗·汤普森(Paul Thompson)的《土壤之魂》(Spirit of the Soil)在1995年问世时就具有开创性,而且一直保存得非常好。经过大幅修订的新版本不仅对农业和伦理学领域有益,而且还为了解汤普森本人不断变化的思想提供了一个新的窗口。这一点很重要,因为汤普森在这方面的工作对这个领域产生了决定性的影响,以至于他的观点有时被当作常识来背诵。由于这本书及其臭名昭著的名声,汤普森可能遭受了哲学家可能遭遇的最坏的命运:这本书中的语言,以及汤普森思考农业核心问题的框架的各个方面,已经成为可持续农业领域的标准,以至于人们不再记得这些术语和思想来自哪里。我有时发现,学生们把保罗·汤普森(Paul Thompson)最先提出的、曾经被认为具有哲学意义的观点当作常识背诵。例如,我以前的一名学生本月在《全球环境变化》杂志上发表的一篇论文包括以下内容: