Assessment and treatment of patients with kinesiophobia: A Delphi consensus

Santi Mattias, Diener Ina, Oostendorp Rob
{"title":"Assessment and treatment of patients with kinesiophobia: A Delphi consensus","authors":"Santi Mattias, Diener Ina, Oostendorp Rob","doi":"10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kinesiophobia is described as pain-related fear of movement and plays a role in the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Several approaches have been described in the literature, but there does not seem to be a consensus on the most appropriate way to evaluate and treat patients with kinesiophobia. The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant assessments and treatments recommended by a consensus of experts. Fourteen experts were identified to participate in a three-round internet-based Delphi study. Participants were asked to propose assessments and treatments (round 1), to grade each proposal on a Likert scale of 9 (round 2), and to reassess their level of agreement (round 3). The consensus was defined with 75% agreement. Five methods of assessment and six treatment approaches reached a consensus. The TAMPA scale reached the top position as an assessment of kinesiophobia. Graded exposure to movement, cognitive and behavioral therapy, and pain neuroscience education were the highest-rated interventions. These results provide the first expert consensus on preferred assessments and treatments for patients with kinesiophobia and correspond with the evidence base in the literature.","PeriodicalId":90608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of novel physiotherapy and physical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kinesiophobia is described as pain-related fear of movement and plays a role in the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Several approaches have been described in the literature, but there does not seem to be a consensus on the most appropriate way to evaluate and treat patients with kinesiophobia. The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant assessments and treatments recommended by a consensus of experts. Fourteen experts were identified to participate in a three-round internet-based Delphi study. Participants were asked to propose assessments and treatments (round 1), to grade each proposal on a Likert scale of 9 (round 2), and to reassess their level of agreement (round 3). The consensus was defined with 75% agreement. Five methods of assessment and six treatment approaches reached a consensus. The TAMPA scale reached the top position as an assessment of kinesiophobia. Graded exposure to movement, cognitive and behavioral therapy, and pain neuroscience education were the highest-rated interventions. These results provide the first expert consensus on preferred assessments and treatments for patients with kinesiophobia and correspond with the evidence base in the literature.
运动恐惧症患者的评估和治疗:德尔菲共识
运动恐惧症被描述为与疼痛有关的运动恐惧,在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的发展中起作用。文献中描述了几种方法,但对于评估和治疗运动恐惧症患者的最合适方法似乎没有达成共识。本研究的目的是确定专家一致推荐的临床相关评估和治疗方法。十四名专家被确定参加了三轮基于互联网的德尔菲研究。参与者被要求提出评估和治疗方法(第1轮),以李克特9分量表(第2轮)对每个建议进行评分,并重新评估他们的一致程度(第3轮)。共识被定义为75%的一致性。五种评估方法和六种治疗方法达成共识。坦帕量表在运动恐惧症的评估中名列前茅。分级接触运动、认知和行为疗法以及疼痛神经科学教育是评价最高的干预措施。这些结果为运动恐惧症患者的首选评估和治疗提供了第一个专家共识,并与文献中的证据基础相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信