Discurso entusiasta y subjetividad política moderna

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY
Martín Baigorria
{"title":"Discurso entusiasta y subjetividad política moderna","authors":"Martín Baigorria","doi":"10.5209/INGE.62421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The revolution of the saints. A study in the origins of radical politics , Michael Walzer describes modern political subjectivity based on the analysis of puritan calvinism throughout the 17th century. In this article we propose a brief history of the term “Enthusiasm” ( Enthusiasmus , Schwarmerei ) in order to show in which ways the theoretical precautions elaborated on religious enthusiasm constitutes a reaction against some key discursive peculiarities also present in modern political practices. According to our thesis, these conceptualizations reflect a number of features inherent to social languages that between 17th and 18th centuries moved from the religious sphere to our modern secular realm.","PeriodicalId":41190,"journal":{"name":"Ingenium-Revista Electronica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodologia en Historia de la Ideas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenium-Revista Electronica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodologia en Historia de la Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/INGE.62421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In The revolution of the saints. A study in the origins of radical politics , Michael Walzer describes modern political subjectivity based on the analysis of puritan calvinism throughout the 17th century. In this article we propose a brief history of the term “Enthusiasm” ( Enthusiasmus , Schwarmerei ) in order to show in which ways the theoretical precautions elaborated on religious enthusiasm constitutes a reaction against some key discursive peculiarities also present in modern political practices. According to our thesis, these conceptualizations reflect a number of features inherent to social languages that between 17th and 18th centuries moved from the religious sphere to our modern secular realm.
热情的话语与现代政治主体性
在《圣人的革命》中。迈克尔·沃尔泽在研究激进政治起源的基础上,通过对整个17世纪清教徒加尔文主义的分析,描述了现代政治主体性。在这篇文章中,我们提出了“热情”一词的简史,以表明在哪些方面,阐述宗教热情的理论预防措施构成了对现代政治实践中也存在的一些关键话语特性的反应。根据我们的论文,这些概念反映了17至18世纪之间从宗教领域转移到现代世俗领域的社会语言固有的一些特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信