The composite identity of Muscicapa virens Linnaeus, and a neotype designation for Eastern Wood Pewee Contopus virens (Tyrannidae)

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Matthew R. Halley
{"title":"The composite identity of Muscicapa virens Linnaeus, and a neotype designation for Eastern Wood Pewee Contopus virens (Tyrannidae)","authors":"Matthew R. Halley","doi":"10.25226/bboc.v143i2.2023.a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. I reviewed the material basis of Muscicapa virens Linnaeus, 1766, long presumed to be the original description of Eastern Wood Pewee Contopus virens (Linnaeus), type species of the genus Contopus Cabanis, 1855, and found it to be an unidentifiable taxonomic composite. Linnaeus' (1766) account was partly based on Brisson's (1760) ‘Gobe-mouche Cendré de la Caroline’, which was based on (1) a non-extant specimen that, as demonstrated herein, was probably a species in the genus Empidonax Cabanis, 1855, and (2) Catesby’s (1731) ‘little brown Fly-catcher’, which was also a taxonomic composite. Linnaeus (1766) also included a novel character in his original description of M. virens—a white supercilium (‘superciliis albis’)—which is lacking in Eastern Wood Pewee, and was probably miscopied from Catesby’s (1731) description of ‘Red-eyed Fly-catcher’ (= Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus Linnaeus, 1766), which appeared on the same plate as the ‘little brown Fly-catcher’. In light of these ambiguities, after a thorough review of literature and relevant primary sources, I designate a neotype specimen for C. virens (Linnaeus) that stabilises nomenclature in accordance with prevailing use.","PeriodicalId":38973,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i2.2023.a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary. I reviewed the material basis of Muscicapa virens Linnaeus, 1766, long presumed to be the original description of Eastern Wood Pewee Contopus virens (Linnaeus), type species of the genus Contopus Cabanis, 1855, and found it to be an unidentifiable taxonomic composite. Linnaeus' (1766) account was partly based on Brisson's (1760) ‘Gobe-mouche Cendré de la Caroline’, which was based on (1) a non-extant specimen that, as demonstrated herein, was probably a species in the genus Empidonax Cabanis, 1855, and (2) Catesby’s (1731) ‘little brown Fly-catcher’, which was also a taxonomic composite. Linnaeus (1766) also included a novel character in his original description of M. virens—a white supercilium (‘superciliis albis’)—which is lacking in Eastern Wood Pewee, and was probably miscopied from Catesby’s (1731) description of ‘Red-eyed Fly-catcher’ (= Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus Linnaeus, 1766), which appeared on the same plate as the ‘little brown Fly-catcher’. In light of these ambiguities, after a thorough review of literature and relevant primary sources, I designate a neotype specimen for C. virens (Linnaeus) that stabilises nomenclature in accordance with prevailing use.
林纳木蝇(Muscicapa virens Linnaeus)的复合同一性及东部木蝇(Contopus virens)的新类型命名
总结。我对《Muscicapa virens Linnaeus, 1766》(长期以来被认为是1855年东部木Pewee Contopus virens (Linnaeus)的原始描述)的物质基础进行了回顾,发现它是一个无法识别的分类组合。Linnaeus(1766)的描述部分基于Brisson(1760)的“Gobe-mouche cendr de la Caroline”,该描述基于(1)一个不存在的标本,如本文所示,该标本可能是1855年的Empidonax Cabanis属的一个物种,以及(2)Catesby(1731)的“小棕色捕蝇器”,这也是一个分类合成物。林奈(1766)还在他对M. virens的原始描述中加入了一个新颖的角色——一种白色的超纤毛(' superciliis albis '),这在东部的Wood Pewee中是没有的,可能是错误地复制了Catesby(1731)对“红眼捕蝇人”的描述(= Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus Linnaeus, 1766),这与“小棕色捕蝇人”出现在同一个盘子上。鉴于这些模糊性,在对文献和相关主要来源进行彻底审查后,我指定了一种新类型的林奈(C. virens, Linnaeus)标本,以根据普遍使用的命名法稳定命名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信